Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght=300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght=0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 3rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-6 py-12\">\r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[400px] rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-12 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/34123\/pexels-photo.jpg\" alt=\"Kompetenca L\u00ebndore Gjykata\" class=\"w-full h-full object-cover brightness-[0.65]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/90 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-8 left-8 text-white pr-8\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-sm mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"mt-4\">Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center \"X\", and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph \"\u00e7\" of Law no. 49\/2012.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Reasoning of the Administrative College<\/h3>\r\n <p>The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 \"On Art and Culture\" provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"mt-4\">The College emphasized that a law is deemed \"special\" only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l'indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale \"X\" e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest'ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 \"Sull'arte e la cultura\" prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"mt-4\">Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come \"speciale\" solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest'ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Nascondi tutte le sezioni \/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Mostra quella selezionata \/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Aggiorna i pulsanti \/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Scroll fluido verso la navigazione \/ Smooth scroll to navigation\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012. Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL) Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs. Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj. Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law. In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center “X”, and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph “\u00e7” of Law no. 49\/2012. Reasoning of the Administrative College The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 “On Art and Culture” provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship. The College emphasized that a law is deemed “special” only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship. Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation. Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale. Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l’indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale “X” e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest’ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro. Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 “Sull’arte e la cultura” prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico. Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come “speciale” solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione. Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest’ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-petani-blog"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012. Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL) Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs. Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj. Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law. In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center “X”, and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph “\u00e7” of Law no. 49\/2012. Reasoning of the Administrative College The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 “On Art and Culture” provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship. The College emphasized that a law is deemed “special” only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship. Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation. Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale. Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l’indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale “X” e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest’ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro. Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 “Sull’arte e la cultura” prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico. Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come “speciale” solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione. Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest’ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":974,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Petani Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012. Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL) Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs. Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj. Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law. In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center “X”, and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph “\u00e7” of Law no. 49\/2012. Reasoning of the Administrative College The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 “On Art and Culture” provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship. The College emphasized that a law is deemed “special” only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship. Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation. Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale. Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l’indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale “X” e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest’ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro. Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 “Sull’arte e la cultura” prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico. Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come “speciale” solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione. Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest’ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"5 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ","datePublished":"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"wordCount":974,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["Petani Blog"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4076"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4076\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4080,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4076\/revisions\/4080"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght=300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght=0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 3rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-6 py-12\">\r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[400px] rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-12 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/34123\/pexels-photo.jpg\" alt=\"Kompetenca L\u00ebndore Gjykata\" class=\"w-full h-full object-cover brightness-[0.65]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/90 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-8 left-8 text-white pr-8\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-sm mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"mt-4\">Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center \"X\", and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph \"\u00e7\" of Law no. 49\/2012.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Reasoning of the Administrative College<\/h3>\r\n <p>The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 \"On Art and Culture\" provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"mt-4\">The College emphasized that a law is deemed \"special\" only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l'indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale \"X\" e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest'ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 \"Sull'arte e la cultura\" prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"mt-4\">Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come \"speciale\" solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest'ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Nascondi tutte le sezioni \/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Mostra quella selezionata \/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Aggiorna i pulsanti \/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Scroll fluido verso la navigazione \/ Smooth scroll to navigation\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012. Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL) Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs. Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj. Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law. In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center “X”, and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph “\u00e7” of Law no. 49\/2012. Reasoning of the Administrative College The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 “On Art and Culture” provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship. The College emphasized that a law is deemed “special” only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship. Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation. Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale. Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l’indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale “X” e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest’ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro. Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 “Sull’arte e la cultura” prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico. Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come “speciale” solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione. Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest’ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-petani-blog"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012. Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL) Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs. Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj. Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law. In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center “X”, and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph “\u00e7” of Law no. 49\/2012. Reasoning of the Administrative College The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 “On Art and Culture” provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship. The College emphasized that a law is deemed “special” only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship. Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation. Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale. Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l’indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale “X” e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest’ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro. Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 “Sull’arte e la cultura” prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico. Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come “speciale” solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione. Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest’ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":974,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Petani Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ Vet\u00ebm fakti q\u00eb pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb organ publik ose institucion n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb tij nuk mjafton p\u00ebr ta kualifikuar mosmarr\u00ebveshjen e pun\u00ebs si mosmarr\u00ebveshje administrative. Kompetenca e gjykatave administrative p\u00ebrcaktohet vet\u00ebm kur marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs rregullohet nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, padit\u00ebsi k\u00ebrkoi nga Bashkia X pages\u00ebn e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimeve q\u00eb buronin nga zgjidhja e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, pag\u00ebn p\u00ebr pushimet vjetore, kthimin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si drejtor pran\u00eb Qendr\u00ebs Kulturore \u201cX\u201d dhe shpenzimet gjyq\u00ebsore. Gjykata e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb e Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs shpalli moskompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr gjykim n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Administrative t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Tiran\u00eb. Kjo e fundit parashtroi konfliktin e kompetenc\u00ebs para Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, duke arsyetuar se marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia rregullohej nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs dhe jo nga nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 7, pika \u201c\u00e7\u201d e Ligjit nr. 49\/2012. Arsyetimi i Kolegjit Administrativ (KA GJL) Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb vler\u00ebsoi se mosmarr\u00ebveshja nuk kishte natyr\u00eb administrative. Ligji nr. 10352\/2010 \u201cP\u00ebr artin dhe kultur\u00ebn\u201d parashikon vet\u00ebm disa rregullime organizative p\u00ebr institucionet publike vendore t\u00eb artit dhe kultur\u00ebs, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien juridike t\u00eb pun\u00ebs i referohet shprehimisht Kodit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs. Kolegji theksoi se nj\u00eb ligj konsiderohet i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm kur rregullon n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb detajuar dhe krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb pavarur nga Kodi i Pun\u00ebs element\u00ebt thelb\u00ebsor\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb rekrutimin, t\u00eb drejtat dhe detyrimet, p\u00ebrfitimet, masat disiplinore, t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e ankimit dhe m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e zgjidhjes s\u00eb k\u00ebsaj marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieje. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb rregulloi kompetenc\u00ebn l\u00ebndore, duke p\u00ebrcaktuar si gjykat\u00eb kompetente Gjykat\u00ebn e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm Durr\u00ebs. Ajo prishi vendimin e k\u00ebsaj gjykate q\u00eb kishte shpallur moskompetenc\u00ebn dhe e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen p\u00ebr vazhdimin e gjykimit pran\u00eb saj. Decision no. 00-2026-1199, dated 27.03.2026 of the Administrative College The mere fact that an employer is a public body or an institution subordinate to it is insufficient to classify a labor dispute as an administrative dispute. The jurisdiction of administrative courts is established only when the employment relationship is governed by a special law. In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Municipality X seeking severance pay, compensation for annual leave, reinstatement to his position as Director of the Cultural Center “X”, and legal costs. The Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs declared a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and transferred the case to the First Instance Administrative Court of Tirana. The Administrative Court subsequently raised a jurisdictional conflict before the Supreme Court, arguing that the employment relationship was governed by the Labor Code and not by a special law pursuant to Article 7, paragraph “\u00e7” of Law no. 49\/2012. Reasoning of the Administrative College The Administrative College of the Supreme Court ruled that the dispute was not administrative in nature. Law no. 10352\/2010 “On Art and Culture” provides only basic organizational regulations for local public art and culture institutions, while explicitly referring to the Labor Code for the underlying legal employment relationship. The College emphasized that a law is deemed “special” only if it comprehensively and independently of the Labor Code regulates the essential elements of employment, including recruitment, rights and duties, benefits, disciplinary actions, the right to appeal, and the termination of the relationship. Consequently, the Supreme Court resolved the conflict by determining that the Court of First Instance of General Jurisdiction in Durr\u00ebs holds subject-matter jurisdiction, overturned its prior ruling of non-competence, and remanded the case to that court for trial continuation. Sentenza n. 00-2026-1199, del 27.03.2026 del Collegio Amministrativo Il solo fatto che il datore di lavoro sia una pubblica amministrazione o un ente da essa dipendente non \u00e8 sufficiente a qualificare una controversia di lavoro come amministrativa. La competenza dei tribunali amministrativi sussiste solo quando il rapporto \u00e8 regolato da una legge speciale. Nel caso di specie, il ricorrente ha chiesto al Comune X il risarcimento dei danni derivanti dalla risoluzione del rapporto di lavoro, l’indennit\u00e0 per le ferie annuali, il reintegro nel posto di lavoro come direttore del Centro Culturale “X” e la rifusione delle spese legali. Il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo ha dichiarato il proprio difetto di competenza per materia, trasmettendo gli atti al Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Tirana. Quest’ultimo ha sollevato conflitto di competenza dinanzi alla Corte Suprema, ritenendo il rapporto disciplinato dal Codice del Lavoro. Ragionamento del Collegio Amministrativo Il Collegio Amministrativo della Corte Suprema ha ritenuto che la controversia non avesse natura amministrativa. La Legge n. 10352\/2010 “Sull’arte e la cultura” prevede unicamente norme organizzative per le istituzioni pubbliche locali, rimandando esplicitamente al Codice del Lavoro per la disciplina del rapporto giuridico. Il Collegio ha sottolineato che una legge pu\u00f2 qualificarsi come “speciale” solo qualora disciplini in modo dettagliato e del tutto autonomo dal Codice del Lavoro gli elementi essenziali del rapporto, quali il reclutamento, i diritti, i doveri, le sanzioni disciplinari e le modalit\u00e0 di cessazione. Per questi motivi, la Corte Suprema ha regolato la competenza per materia individuando come giudice competente il Tribunale di Primo Grado della Giurisdizione Generale di Durazzo, cassando la decisione di quest’ultimo e rinviando la causa per la prosecuzione del giudizio.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"5 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ","datePublished":"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"wordCount":974,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["Petani Blog"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-20T19:33:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-20T19:36:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-1199-date-27-03-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-1199, dat\u00eb 27.03.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4076"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4076\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4080,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4076\/revisions\/4080"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}