Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght@0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n .legal-body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 2rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n .content-section p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n\r\n \/* WordPress Responsive Image Overrides *\/\r\n .wp-responsive-img {\r\n width: 100% !important;\r\n max-width: 100% !important;\r\n height: 100% !important;\r\n object-fit: cover !important;\r\n object-position: center 30% !important;\r\n }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased legal-body\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 py-6\">\r\n \r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full aspect-[16\/9] md:aspect-[21\/9] rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-10 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/7876314\/pexels-photo-7876314.jpeg\" alt=\"Gjykata dhe Drejt\u00ebsia\" class=\"wp-responsive-img brightness-[0.65]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/95 via-black\/40 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-4 left-4 sm:bottom-8 sm:left-8 right-4 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-xs sm:text-sm mb-1 sm:mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550)<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-6 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-2xl mb-8 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs<\/h3>\r\n <p>Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-6 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, \"Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\" SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-2xl mb-8 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Court Reasoning<\/h3>\r\n <p>The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court's ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-6 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull'entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>\u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 \"Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\" SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest'ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l'incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d'Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0 stato presentato dai familiari stretti (moglie, figli e nipoti). Nel caso in esame, una seconda azione \u00e8 stata promossa da altri parenti (il fratello e i nipoti della vittima).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-2xl mb-8 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento della Corte<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Collegio sottolinea che l'intensit\u00e0 del legame familiare e affettivo incide direttamente sulla quantificazione del danno. I giudici di merito, richiamando la sentenza unificata n. 12\/2007, hanno liquidato i danni non patrimoniali nella misura di \u00bc o \u00bd del danno biologico, senza fornire la necessaria motivazione. Nessuno dei tribunali ha evidenziato le ragioni per cui sia stato applicato un livello cos\u00ec elevato di risarcimento, sebbene il legame di sangue fosse molto pi\u00f9 distante rispetto a quello di parenti stretti come genitori, figli o coniugi.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Questi soggetti, di regola, non patiscono lo stesso grado di sofferenza morale ed esistenziale. Considerata la cerchia ristretta dei familiari, il Collegio ritiene inammissibile che parenti collaterali come i nipoti beneficino della stessa misura di risarcimento. La KCGJL ritiene che la sentenza della corte d'appello sia l'effetto della mancata osservanza del diritto sostanziale e processuale. Di conseguenza, la decisione deve essere annullata e la causa rinviata per un nuovo esame dinanzi alla Corte d'Appello di Giurisdizione Generale.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \r\n \/\/ Fixed dynamic scrolling position safe for Elementor sticky layouts\r\n const navContainer = document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container');\r\n if(navContainer) {\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: navContainer.offsetTop - 40, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb. Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror. Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat). Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti. K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners. It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages. The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews). Court Reasoning The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse. These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court’s ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull’entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi. \u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest’ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l’incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale. Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d’Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4016","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-petani-blog"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb. Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror. Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat). Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti. K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners. It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages. The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews). Court Reasoning The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse. These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court’s ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull’entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi. \u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest’ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l’incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale. Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d’Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1279,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Petani Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb. Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror. Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat). Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti. K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners. It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages. The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews). Court Reasoning The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse. These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court’s ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull’entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi. \u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest’ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l’incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale. Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d’Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil","datePublished":"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"wordCount":1279,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["Petani Blog"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4016","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4016"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4016\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4020,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4016\/revisions\/4020"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght@0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n .legal-body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 2rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n .content-section p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n\r\n \/* WordPress Responsive Image Overrides *\/\r\n .wp-responsive-img {\r\n width: 100% !important;\r\n max-width: 100% !important;\r\n height: 100% !important;\r\n object-fit: cover !important;\r\n object-position: center 30% !important;\r\n }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased legal-body\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 py-6\">\r\n \r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full aspect-[16\/9] md:aspect-[21\/9] rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-10 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/7876314\/pexels-photo-7876314.jpeg\" alt=\"Gjykata dhe Drejt\u00ebsia\" class=\"wp-responsive-img brightness-[0.65]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/95 via-black\/40 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-4 left-4 sm:bottom-8 sm:left-8 right-4 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-xs sm:text-sm mb-1 sm:mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550)<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-6 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-2xl mb-8 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs<\/h3>\r\n <p>Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-6 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, \"Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\" SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-2xl mb-8 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Court Reasoning<\/h3>\r\n <p>The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court's ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-2xl sm:text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-6 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull'entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>\u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 \"Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\" SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest'ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l'incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d'Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0 stato presentato dai familiari stretti (moglie, figli e nipoti). Nel caso in esame, una seconda azione \u00e8 stata promossa da altri parenti (il fratello e i nipoti della vittima).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-2xl mb-8 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento della Corte<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Collegio sottolinea che l'intensit\u00e0 del legame familiare e affettivo incide direttamente sulla quantificazione del danno. I giudici di merito, richiamando la sentenza unificata n. 12\/2007, hanno liquidato i danni non patrimoniali nella misura di \u00bc o \u00bd del danno biologico, senza fornire la necessaria motivazione. Nessuno dei tribunali ha evidenziato le ragioni per cui sia stato applicato un livello cos\u00ec elevato di risarcimento, sebbene il legame di sangue fosse molto pi\u00f9 distante rispetto a quello di parenti stretti come genitori, figli o coniugi.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Questi soggetti, di regola, non patiscono lo stesso grado di sofferenza morale ed esistenziale. Considerata la cerchia ristretta dei familiari, il Collegio ritiene inammissibile che parenti collaterali come i nipoti beneficino della stessa misura di risarcimento. La KCGJL ritiene che la sentenza della corte d'appello sia l'effetto della mancata osservanza del diritto sostanziale e processuale. Di conseguenza, la decisione deve essere annullata e la causa rinviata per un nuovo esame dinanzi alla Corte d'Appello di Giurisdizione Generale.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \r\n \/\/ Fixed dynamic scrolling position safe for Elementor sticky layouts\r\n const navContainer = document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container');\r\n if(navContainer) {\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: navContainer.offsetTop - 40, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb. Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror. Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat). Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti. K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners. It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages. The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews). Court Reasoning The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse. These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court’s ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull’entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi. \u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest’ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l’incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale. Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d’Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4016","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-petani-blog"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb. Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror. Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat). Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti. K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners. It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages. The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews). Court Reasoning The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse. These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court’s ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull’entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi. \u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest’ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l’incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale. Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d’Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1279,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Petani Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil Shkalla e lidhjes familjare ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm mbi legjitimimin aktiv t\u00eb subjektit p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb vdekjes s\u00eb familjarit, por edhe mbi nivelin e k\u00ebtij d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. K\u00ebto subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial, krahasuar me familjen e ngusht\u00eb si nj\u00ebsin\u00eb baz\u00eb ose me personat n\u00eb bashk\u00ebjetes\u00eb. Ka rezultuar se, padit\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebllai i t\u00eb ndjerit, nd\u00ebrsa padit\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb jan\u00eb nip\u00ebr e mbesa t\u00eb t\u00eb ndjerit, i cili ka vdekur si rezultat i kontaktit me rrym\u00ebn elektrike, m\u00eb 18.05.2013. Padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja ka ndodhur p\u00ebr faj t\u00eb t\u00eb paditurit, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cOperatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike\u201d SHA (OSHEE), duke qen\u00eb se kjo e fundit nuk ka marr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha masat e duhura teknike q\u00eb do t\u00eb mund\u00ebsonin shmangen e aksidentit. Duke iu referuar lidhjes s\u00eb gjinis\u00eb, padit\u00ebsit kan\u00eb pretenduar se vdekja u ka shkaktuar d\u00ebm jopasuror. Gjykata e Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Fier pranoi padin\u00eb dhe detyroi pal\u00ebn e paditur t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim jopasuror n\u00eb form\u00ebn e d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Gjykata e Apelit Vlor\u00eb vendosi l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi. KCGJL konstaton se fillimisht i jan\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me nj\u00eb padi t\u00eb par\u00eb bashk\u00ebshortja, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt dhe nip\u00ebrit e t\u00eb ndjerit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen objekt gjykimi, nj\u00eb padi e dyt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb paraqitur nga t\u00eb af\u00ebrmit e tjer\u00eb (v\u00ebllai, nip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat). Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kolegji thekson se shkalla e lidhjes familjare dhe ndjesore ka ndikim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb mbi d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimin. Gjykatat e faktit, duke iu referuar vendimit unifikues nr. 12\/2007, kan\u00eb aplikuar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblime jopasurore n\u00eb mas\u00ebn \u00bc ose \u00bd e d\u00ebmit biologjik, pa dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumentimin e nevojsh\u00ebm. Asnj\u00eb prej gjykatave nuk ka evidentuar arsyen pse ka aplikuar k\u00ebt\u00eb nivel t\u00eb lart\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi, megjith\u00ebse raporti i lidhjes s\u00eb gjakut ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb i larg\u00ebt se ai i familjar\u00ebve t\u00eb af\u00ebrt si prind\u00ebrit, f\u00ebmij\u00ebt apo bashk\u00ebshorti. K\u00ebta subjekte, si rregull, nuk p\u00ebsojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn shkall\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebmit moral dhe ekzistencial. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh rrethin e ngusht\u00eb familjar, Kolegji vler\u00ebson se \u00ebsht\u00eb e papranueshme q\u00eb t\u00eb af\u00ebrm t\u00eb till\u00eb si \u201cnip\u00ebrit dhe mbesat\u201d t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn mas\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimi. KCGJL \u00e7mon se vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit \u00ebsht\u00eb rrjedhoj\u00eb e mosrespektimit t\u00eb ligjit material dhe procedural. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb, vendimi duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-4321 (550), dated 26.11.2025 of the Civil College The degree of family relationship has a direct impact not only on the active standing (locus standi) of a subject to claim compensation due to the death of a family member, but also on the quantitative level of such compensation. As a rule, these relatives do not suffer the same degree of moral and existential damage compared to the immediate family as the core unit or cohabiting partners. It was established that the primary plaintiff is the brother of the deceased, while the other plaintiffs are nieces and nephews of the deceased, who passed away following contact with an electrical current on 18.05.2013. The plaintiffs claimed that the death occurred due to the fault of the defendant, “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), as the latter failed to implement the necessary technical measures to prevent the accident. Referencing their family relationship, the plaintiffs claimed non-pecuniary damages. The District Court of Fier accepted the lawsuit, ordering the defendant to pay non-pecuniary damages for moral and existential harm. The Court of Appeal of Vlora upheld this decision. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) notes that initially, a first lawsuit had already been submitted by the immediate family\u2014specifically the wife, children, and grandchildren. In the current case, this second lawsuit was brought forward by more distant relatives (the brother, nieces, and nephews). Court Reasoning The College emphasizes that the proximity of the familial and emotional bond directly dictates the compensation thresholds. The lower courts, referring to Unified Decision no. 12\/2007, awarded non-pecuniary damages amounting to \u00bc or \u00bd of biological damage without offering the necessary legal reasoning. Neither court clarified why such high levels of compensation were granted, despite the blood relation being substantially more distant than that of immediate family members like parents, children, or a spouse. These subjects, as a rule, do not endure the equivalent level of moral and existential trauma. Taking the inner family circle into account, the College deems it unacceptable for collateral relatives such as nieces and nephews to receive matching compensation amounts. The KCGJL finds that the appeal court’s ruling stems from a failure to comply with substantive and procedural law. Consequently, the decision must be overturned, and the case remanded for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4321 (550), del 26.11.2025 del Collegio Civile Il grado di parentela influisce direttamente non solo sulla legittimazione attiva del soggetto a richiedere il risarcimento del danno per il decesso di un familiare, ma anche sull’entit\u00e0 del risarcimento stesso. Di norma, tali soggetti non subiscono lo stesso grado di danno morale ed esistenziale rispetto alla famiglia ristretta intesa come nucleo essenziale o ai conviventi. \u00c8 emerso che il ricorrente \u00e8 il fratello del defunto, mentre gli altri ricorrenti sono nipoti dello stesso, deceduto a causa di una scossa elettrica in data 18.05.2013. I ricorrenti hanno sostenuto che il decesso sia avvenuto per colpa della convenuta, la societ\u00e0 “Operatori i Shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb Energjis\u00eb Elektrike” SHA (OSHEE), in quanto quest’ultima non ha adottato le adeguate misure tecniche atte ad evitare l’incidente. In virt\u00f9 del loro legame di parentela, i ricorrenti hanno richiesto il risarcimento del danno non patrimoniale. Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Fier ha accolto la domanda, condannando la parte convenuta al pagamento del danno non patrimoniale sotto forma di danno morale ed esistenziale. La Corte d’Appello di Valona ha confermato tale decisione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) osserva che, inizialmente, un primo ricorso era gi\u00e0","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil","datePublished":"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"wordCount":1279,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["Petani Blog"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T06:42:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T06:51:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4321-550-date-26-11-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4321 (550), Dat\u00eb 26.11.2025 i Kolegjit Civil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4016","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4016"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4016\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4020,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4016\/revisions\/4020"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}