Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght@0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 3rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-6 py-12\">\r\n \r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[400px] rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-12 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/32266781\/pexels-photo-32266781.jpeg\" alt=\"Gjykata\" class=\"w-full h-full object-cover brightness-[0.7]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/90 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-8 left-8 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-sm mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528)<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor's approval.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee's lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Court Reasoning (KCGJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal's decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall'attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all'approvazione del locatore.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l'utilizzo di locali amministrati da un'universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l'immobile. L'universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell'immobile e al pagamento di un'indennit\u00e0 d'uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d'appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull'obbligo di rilascio del bene.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l'attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto riguarda gli investimenti, il KCGJL sottolinea che la natura giuridica del contratto non cambia a causa della loro previsione e che il rimborso degli stessi deve essere valutato in conformit\u00e0 alle clausole contrattuali, in particolare al requisito dell'approvazione da parte del locatore. Per questo motivo, la decisione della corte d'appello \u00e8 considerata parzialmente censurabile in tale ambito.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>In conclusione, il KCGJL ha deciso di confermare la sentenza della corte d'appello per la parte relativa al rigetto della domanda per difetto di legittimazione e all'obbligo di rilascio del bene, annullando parzialmente la sentenza d'appello per la parte relativa agli investimenti e alla natura giuridica del contratto.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Scroll to navigation\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs. Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL) KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs. Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor’s approval. The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract. The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee’s lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property. Court Reasoning (KCGJL) The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard. In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal’s decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall’attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all’approvazione del locatore. Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l’utilizzo di locali amministrati da un’universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l’immobile. L’universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto. Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell’immobile e al pagamento di un’indennit\u00e0 d’uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d’appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull’obbligo di rilascio del bene. Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL) Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l’attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs. Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL) KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs. Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor’s approval. The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract. The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee’s lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property. Court Reasoning (KCGJL) The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard. In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal’s decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall’attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all’approvazione del locatore. Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l’utilizzo di locali amministrati da un’universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l’immobile. L’universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto. Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell’immobile e al pagamento di un’indennit\u00e0 d’uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d’appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull’obbligo di rilascio del bene. Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL) Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l’attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1228,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs. Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL) KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs. Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor’s approval. The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract. The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee’s lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property. Court Reasoning (KCGJL) The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard. In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal’s decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall’attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all’approvazione del locatore. Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l’utilizzo di locali amministrati da un’universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l’immobile. L’universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto. Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell’immobile e al pagamento di un’indennit\u00e0 d’uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d’appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull’obbligo di rilascio del bene. Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL) Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l’attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil","datePublished":"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"wordCount":1228,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4011"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4011\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4015,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4011\/revisions\/4015"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght@0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 3rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-6 py-12\">\r\n \r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[400px] rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-12 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/32266781\/pexels-photo-32266781.jpeg\" alt=\"Gjykata\" class=\"w-full h-full object-cover brightness-[0.7]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/90 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-8 left-8 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-sm mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528)<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor's approval.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee's lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Court Reasoning (KCGJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal's decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall'attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all'approvazione del locatore.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l'utilizzo di locali amministrati da un'universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l'immobile. L'universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell'immobile e al pagamento di un'indennit\u00e0 d'uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d'appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull'obbligo di rilascio del bene.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL)<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l'attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto riguarda gli investimenti, il KCGJL sottolinea che la natura giuridica del contratto non cambia a causa della loro previsione e che il rimborso degli stessi deve essere valutato in conformit\u00e0 alle clausole contrattuali, in particolare al requisito dell'approvazione da parte del locatore. Per questo motivo, la decisione della corte d'appello \u00e8 considerata parzialmente censurabile in tale ambito.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>In conclusione, il KCGJL ha deciso di confermare la sentenza della corte d'appello per la parte relativa al rigetto della domanda per difetto di legittimazione e all'obbligo di rilascio del bene, annullando parzialmente la sentenza d'appello per la parte relativa agli investimenti e alla natura giuridica del contratto.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Scroll to navigation\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs. Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL) KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs. Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor’s approval. The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract. The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee’s lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property. Court Reasoning (KCGJL) The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard. In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal’s decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall’attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all’approvazione del locatore. Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l’utilizzo di locali amministrati da un’universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l’immobile. L’universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto. Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell’immobile e al pagamento di un’indennit\u00e0 d’uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d’appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull’obbligo di rilascio del bene. Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL) Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l’attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs. Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL) KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs. Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor’s approval. The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract. The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee’s lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property. Court Reasoning (KCGJL) The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard. In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal’s decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall’attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all’approvazione del locatore. Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l’utilizzo di locali amministrati da un’universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l’immobile. L’universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto. Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell’immobile e al pagamento di un’indennit\u00e0 d’uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d’appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull’obbligo di rilascio del bene. Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL) Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l’attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1228,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528) Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebniet e qiras\u00eb, k\u00ebrkimi p\u00ebr lirimin dhe dor\u00ebzimin e sendit i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit nd\u00ebrsa qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri nuk legjitimitet t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim ndaj poseduesit aktual. Parashikimi i investimeve n\u00eb kontrat\u00eb nuk ndryshon natyr\u00ebn e saj si kontrat\u00eb qiraje dhe kompensimi i tyre kusht\u00ebzohet nga miratimi i qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Pal\u00ebt kan\u00eb lidhur kontrata qiraje p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e ambienteve n\u00eb administrim t\u00eb nj\u00eb universiteti. Pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs, qiramarr\u00ebsi nuk ka dor\u00ebzuar ambientin. Universiteti ka lidhur kontrat\u00eb t\u00eb re qiraje me nj\u00eb subjekt tjet\u00ebr, i cili ka k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e ambientit dhe shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e tij. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, qiramarr\u00ebsi i m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm ka k\u00ebrkuar njohjen e investimeve dhe rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs. Gjykata e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb ka rr\u00ebzuar padin\u00eb e qiramarr\u00ebsit t\u00eb ri p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti aktiv dhe ka detyruar qiramarr\u00ebsin e m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb liroj\u00eb ambientin dhe t\u00eb paguaj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin. Ajo ka pranuar pjes\u00ebrisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr kompensimin e investimeve dhe ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkimet p\u00ebr rilidhjen e kontrat\u00ebs dhe fitimin e munguar. Gjykata e apelit ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke ndar\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin arsyetim si p\u00ebr legjitimitetin, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr trajtimin e investimeve dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs (KCGJL) KCGJL \u00e7mon se padit\u00ebsi (qiramarr\u00ebsi i ri) nuk ka legjitimitet aktiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar lirimin e sendit, pasi kjo e drejt\u00eb i takon vet\u00ebm qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsit. Mbajtja e sendit pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs p\u00ebrb\u00ebn posedim t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm. Sa i p\u00ebrket investimeve, KCGJL thekson se natyra juridike e kontrat\u00ebs nuk ndryshon p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb parashikimit t\u00eb tyre dhe se kompensimi i investimeve duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me kushtet kontraktore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr miratim nga qiradh\u00ebn\u00ebsi. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit vler\u00ebsohet pjes\u00ebrisht i cenuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, KCGJL ka vendosur l\u00ebnien n\u00eb fuqi t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me rr\u00ebzimin e padis\u00eb p\u00ebr munges\u00eb legjitimiteti dhe detyrimin p\u00ebr lirimin e sendit dhe cenim i pjessh\u00ebm i vendimit t\u00eb apelit p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb lidhet me investimet dhe natyr\u00ebn juridike t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs. Decision no. 00-2025-4036 (528), dated 12.11.2026 of the Civil College In lease relationships, the claim for the vacation and delivery of the property belongs solely to the lessor, whereas the new lessee lacks active standing to directly demand this obligation from the current possessor. The inclusion of investment provisions in the contract does not alter its legal nature as a lease agreement, and their compensation remains conditional upon the lessor’s approval. The parties entered into lease contracts for the use of premises administered by a university. Upon the expiration of the contract, the previous lessee failed to vacate the premises. The university subsequently concluded a new lease agreement with another entity, which then sought the release of the property and compensation for its continued use. Meanwhile, the former lessee requested recognition of their investments and the renewal of the lease contract. The court of first instance dismissed the new lessee’s lawsuit due to a lack of active standing and ordered the former lessee to vacate the premises and pay compensation for usage. It partially granted the request for investment compensation while dismissing the claims for contract renewal and lost profits. The court of appeal upheld the first instance decision, sharing the same reasoning regarding legal standing, the handling of investments, and the obligation to release the property. Court Reasoning (KCGJL) The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the plaintiff (the new lessee) does not possess active standing to demand the vacation of the property, as this right belongs exclusively to the lessor. Retaining the property after the contract expires constitutes unlawful possession. Regarding the investments, the KCGJL stresses that the legal nature of the contract does not change because of such provisions, and investment compensation must be evaluated in compliance with the contractual terms, specifically the requirement of prior approval by the lessor. Therefore, the decision of the court of appeal is deemed partially vulnerable in this regard. In conclusion, the KCGJL decided to uphold the court of appeal’s decision regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit due to lack of standing and the obligation to vacate the property, while partially overturning the appellate decision concerning the investments and the legal nature of the contract. Sentenza n. 00-2025-4036 (528), del 12.11.2026 del Collegio Civile Nei rapporti di locazione, la richiesta di rilascio e consegna del bene spetta esclusivamente al locatore, mentre il nuovo conduttore non \u00e8 legittimato ad esigere direttamente tale adempimento dall’attuale possessore. La previsione di investimenti nel contratto non ne muta la natura giuridica di contratto di locazione e il loro indennizzo \u00e8 subordinato all’approvazione del locatore. Le parti hanno stipulato contratti di locazione per l’utilizzo di locali amministrati da un’universit\u00e0. Alla scadenza del contratto, il precedente conduttore non ha rilasciato l’immobile. L’universit\u00e0 ha quindi stipulato un nuovo contratto di locazione con un altro soggetto, il quale ha richiesto lo sgombero dei locali e un indennizzo per il loro utilizzo. Nel frattempo, il precedente conduttore ha richiesto il riconoscimento degli investimenti effettuati e il rinnovo del contratto. Il tribunale di primo grado ha respinto la causa del nuovo conduttore per difetto di legittimazione attiva e ha condannato il precedente conduttore al rilascio dell’immobile e al pagamento di un’indennit\u00e0 d’uso. Ha accolto parzialmente la domanda di compensazione degli investimenti, respingendo le richieste di rinnovo contrattuale e di lucro cessante. La corte d’appello ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, condividendo la medesima motivazione sia sulla legittimazione che sul trattamento degli investimenti e sull’obbligo di rilascio del bene. Ragionamento della Corte (KCGJL) Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) ritiene che l’attore (il nuovo conduttore) sia privo di legittimazione attiva per richiedere il rilascio del bene, in quanto tale diritto spetta unicamente al locatore. La detenzione del bene dopo la scadenza del contratto costituisce un possesso illegittimo. Per quanto","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil","datePublished":"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"wordCount":1228,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T07:33:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T07:35:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-4036-528-date-12-11-2026-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-4036 (528), Dat\u00eb 12.11.2026 i Kolegjit Civil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4011"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4011\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4015,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4011\/revisions\/4015"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}