Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght@0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 3rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-6 py-12\">\r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[400px] rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-12 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/8111818\/pexels-photo-8111818.jpeg\" alt=\"Gjykata\" class=\"w-full h-full object-cover brightness-[0.7]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/90 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-8 left-8 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-sm mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs<\/h3>\r\n <p>Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">In cases of illegal construction on the owner's land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner's request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the \"homeless\" status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Court Reasoning<\/h3>\r\n <p>The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court's decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff's requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant's construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all'edificio creando un'unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell'edificio in possesso dell'ente pubblico, invece di respingere l'azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un'azione di rivendicazione.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l'Ufficio Ipotecario di Scutari in data 27.04.1994. Da parte del Consiglio di Regolazione del Territorio del Comune di Scutari, in data 16.06.1993, \u00e8 stato rilasciato un permesso di costruzione per un palazzo di 6 piani con due sezioni, incluso nel terreno restituito agli ex proprietari.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Dopo la costruzione dell'oggetto, l'Ente Nazionale degli Alloggi ha registrato il titolo di propriet\u00e0 a suo favore e successivamente, gli appartamenti inclusi nell'edificio in questione sono stati distribuiti a persone aventi diritto allo status di \"senza tetto\". Il ricorrente si \u00e8 rivolto al tribunale con un'azione diretta contro i convenuti, il Comune di Scutari e la Direzione Regionale dell'Ente Nazionale degli Alloggi, chiedendo l'obbligo di riconoscimento della compropriet\u00e0 sull'oggetto costruito.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento della Corte<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Scutari ha respinto l'azione, valutando che la costruzione fosse illegale. La Corte d'Appello di Scutari ha deciso di annullare la decisione del Tribunale Distrettuale con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un'azione di rivendicazione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) valuta che la controversia riguarda il diritto soggettivo di propriet\u00e0 e la sua tutela contro interventi illegali da parte di terzi o enti pubblici.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Secondo l'articolo 41 e seguenti della Costituzione, sono riconosciute diverse forme di compensazione del diritto di propriet\u00e0, che sono il risultato dell'esproprio legale da parte dello Stato, sia con il pagamento in valore nei casi di impossibilit\u00e0 di restituzione del bene, sia con unit\u00e0 immobiliari nei casi in cui il terreno viene investito per la costruzione.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Considerando il fatto che le unit\u00e0 di servizio reclamate erano ancora di propriet\u00e0 dello Stato, la corte d'appello deve fornire nel nuovo giudizio una risposta esaustiva alle richieste della parte ricorrente circa la possibilit\u00e0 o meno di ripristinare in via giudiziaria il diritto soggettivo di propriet\u00e0 sul terreno inciso dalla costruzione della parte convenuta e se avesse scelto il mezzo procedurale corretto per realizzare tale diritto. Di conseguenza, la decisione di tale corte deve essere annullata e la causa rinviata per un nuovo esame presso la Corte d'Appello di Giurisdizione Generale.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Scroll to navigation\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve. Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme. Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College In cases of illegal construction on the owner’s land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner’s request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio). With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners. After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the “homeless” status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object. Court Reasoning The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court’s decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies. According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction. Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff’s requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant’s construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all’edificio creando un’unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell’edificio in possesso dell’ente pubblico, invece di respingere l’azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un’azione di rivendicazione. Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l’Ufficio Ipotecario<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve. Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme. Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College In cases of illegal construction on the owner’s land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner’s request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio). With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners. After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the “homeless” status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object. Court Reasoning The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court’s decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies. According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction. Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff’s requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant’s construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all’edificio creando un’unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell’edificio in possesso dell’ente pubblico, invece di respingere l’azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un’azione di rivendicazione. Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l’Ufficio Ipotecario\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1442,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve. Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme. Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College In cases of illegal construction on the owner’s land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner’s request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio). With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners. After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the “homeless” status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object. Court Reasoning The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court’s decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies. According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction. Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff’s requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant’s construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all’edificio creando un’unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell’edificio in possesso dell’ente pubblico, invece di respingere l’azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un’azione di rivendicazione. Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l’Ufficio Ipotecario","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"7 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil","datePublished":"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"wordCount":1442,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3981"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3981\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3988,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3981\/revisions\/3988"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght@0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n }\r\n body { font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif; background-color: var(--cream); color: var(--espresso); line-height: 1.8; }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n .lang-nav-container { width: 100%; display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 3rem; }\r\n .lang-nav { display: inline-flex; background-color: var(--espresso); padding: 4px; border-radius: 9999px; border: 1px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .language-btn { padding: 8px 24px; border-radius: 9999px; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); transition: all 0.3s ease; text-transform: uppercase; cursor: pointer; border: none; background: transparent; }\r\n .language-btn.active { background-color: var(--gold); color: white; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }\r\n\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n @keyframes fadeIn { from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); } }\r\n\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter { float: left; font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; font-size: 4.5rem; line-height: 3.5rem; padding-top: 8px; padding-right: 12px; color: var(--gold); font-weight: 700; }\r\n p { margin-bottom: 1.5rem; font-size: 1.125rem; color: #333; }\r\n \r\n .case-card { background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important; color: #ffffff !important; border-left: 4px solid var(--gold); }\r\n .case-card p, .case-card h3 { color: #ffffff !important; }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-6 py-12\">\r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[400px] rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-12 border-b-4 border-[var(--gold)]\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/8111818\/pexels-photo-8111818.jpeg\" alt=\"Gjykata\" class=\"w-full h-full object-cover brightness-[0.7]\">\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/90 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-8 left-8 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-[var(--gold)] tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-sm mb-2\">Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('sq')\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Sq<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('en')\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">En<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\"switchLang('it')\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">It<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs<\/h3>\r\n <p>Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">In cases of illegal construction on the owner's land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner's request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio).<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the \"homeless\" status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Court Reasoning<\/h3>\r\n <p>The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court's decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff's requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant's construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-3xl text-[var(--brown-deep)] mb-8 border-b border-[var(--gold)]\/20 pb-4\">Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all'edificio creando un'unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell'edificio in possesso dell'ente pubblico, invece di respingere l'azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un'azione di rivendicazione.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l'Ufficio Ipotecario di Scutari in data 27.04.1994. Da parte del Consiglio di Regolazione del Territorio del Comune di Scutari, in data 16.06.1993, \u00e8 stato rilasciato un permesso di costruzione per un palazzo di 6 piani con due sezioni, incluso nel terreno restituito agli ex proprietari.<\/p>\r\n \r\n <p>Dopo la costruzione dell'oggetto, l'Ente Nazionale degli Alloggi ha registrato il titolo di propriet\u00e0 a suo favore e successivamente, gli appartamenti inclusi nell'edificio in questione sono stati distribuiti a persone aventi diritto allo status di \"senza tetto\". Il ricorrente si \u00e8 rivolto al tribunale con un'azione diretta contro i convenuti, il Comune di Scutari e la Direzione Regionale dell'Ente Nazionale degli Alloggi, chiedendo l'obbligo di riconoscimento della compropriet\u00e0 sull'oggetto costruito.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\"case-card p-8 rounded-2xl mb-10 shadow-lg\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-xl font-bold mb-4\">Ragionamento della Corte<\/h3>\r\n <p>Il Tribunale Distrettuale di Scutari ha respinto l'azione, valutando che la costruzione fosse illegale. La Corte d'Appello di Scutari ha deciso di annullare la decisione del Tribunale Distrettuale con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un'azione di rivendicazione. Il Collegio Civile della Corte Suprema (KCGJL) valuta che la controversia riguarda il diritto soggettivo di propriet\u00e0 e la sua tutela contro interventi illegali da parte di terzi o enti pubblici.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Secondo l'articolo 41 e seguenti della Costituzione, sono riconosciute diverse forme di compensazione del diritto di propriet\u00e0, che sono il risultato dell'esproprio legale da parte dello Stato, sia con il pagamento in valore nei casi di impossibilit\u00e0 di restituzione del bene, sia con unit\u00e0 immobiliari nei casi in cui il terreno viene investito per la costruzione.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Considerando il fatto che le unit\u00e0 di servizio reclamate erano ancora di propriet\u00e0 dello Stato, la corte d'appello deve fornire nel nuovo giudizio una risposta esaustiva alle richieste della parte ricorrente circa la possibilit\u00e0 o meno di ripristinare in via giudiziaria il diritto soggettivo di propriet\u00e0 sul terreno inciso dalla costruzione della parte convenuta e se avesse scelto il mezzo procedurale corretto per realizzare tale diritto. Di conseguenza, la decisione di tale corte deve essere annullata e la causa rinviata per un nuovo esame presso la Corte d'Appello di Giurisdizione Generale.<\/p>\r\n <\/article>\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));\r\n \/\/ Show selected\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Update buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(b => b.classList.remove('active'));\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \/\/ Scroll to navigation\r\n window.scrollTo({ top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20, behavior: 'smooth' });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve. Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme. Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College In cases of illegal construction on the owner’s land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner’s request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio). With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners. After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the “homeless” status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object. Court Reasoning The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court’s decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies. According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction. Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff’s requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant’s construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all’edificio creando un’unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell’edificio in possesso dell’ente pubblico, invece di respingere l’azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un’azione di rivendicazione. Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l’Ufficio Ipotecario<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve. Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme. Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College In cases of illegal construction on the owner’s land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner’s request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio). With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners. After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the “homeless” status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object. Court Reasoning The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court’s decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies. According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction. Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff’s requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant’s construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all’edificio creando un’unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell’edificio in possesso dell’ente pubblico, invece di respingere l’azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un’azione di rivendicazione. Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l’Ufficio Ipotecario\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1442,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 – Petani Law & Tax Analiz\u00eb Juridike \u2022 KCGJL Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 Sq En It Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686, dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil N\u00eb rastet e nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme me nd\u00ebrtim mbi truallin e pronarit, nga organi publik, duke qen\u00eb se pasuria truall nuk ka humbur, por \u00ebsht\u00eb bashkuar me nd\u00ebrtes\u00ebn duke krijuar nj\u00eb send t\u00eb vet\u00ebm, gjykata duhet t\u00eb konsideroj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e pronarit t\u00eb truallit p\u00ebr njohjen e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb mbi pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vecanta t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimit q\u00eb jan\u00eb n\u00eb posedim t\u00eb organit publik dhe jo t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb padin\u00eb me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. Me vendimin e KKKP t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb trash\u00ebgimtar\u00ebve (ku b\u00ebn pjes\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsi), \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer nj\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqe trualli prej 3910 m\u00b2, regjistruar pran\u00eb Zyr\u00ebs s\u00eb Hipotek\u00ebs Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 27.04.1994. Nga ana e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Rregullimit t\u00eb Territorit n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr, dat\u00eb 16.06.1993, \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb leje nd\u00ebrtimi p\u00ebr nj\u00eb pallat 6-kat\u00ebsh me dy seksione, q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet n\u00eb truallin q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer ish-pronar\u00ebve. Pas nd\u00ebrtimit t\u00eb objektit, Enti Komb\u00ebtar i Banesave, e ka regjistruar titullin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb tij dhe m\u00eb pas, apartamentet q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihen n\u00eb godin\u00ebn n\u00eb fjal\u00eb, i jan\u00eb shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb personave q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb statusin si \u201ct\u00eb pastreh\u00eb\u201d. Padit\u00ebsi i \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar gjykat\u00ebs me padin\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn ia kundrejton pal\u00ebve t\u00eb paditura, Bashkis\u00eb Shkod\u00ebr dhe Drejtoris\u00eb Rajonale t\u00eb Entit Komb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Banesave, duke k\u00ebrkuar detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb na njohur bashk\u00ebpronar mbi objektin e nd\u00ebrtuar. Arsyetimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Gjykata e Rrethit Shkod\u00ebr e rr\u00ebzoi padin\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar se nd\u00ebrtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i paligjsh\u00ebm. Gjykata e Apelit Shkod\u00ebr, ka vendosur prishjen e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Rrethit Gjyq\u00ebsor Shkod\u00ebr me arsyetimin se padit\u00ebsi duhet t\u00eb ngrinte padin\u00eb e rivendikimit. KCGJL \u00e7mon se mosmarr\u00ebveshja lidhet me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn subjektive t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe mbrojtjen e saj ndaj nd\u00ebrhyrjeve t\u00eb paligjshme. Sipas nenit 41 e vijues t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs njihen disa forma t\u00eb kompesimit t\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb, q\u00eb jan\u00eb rezultat i shpron\u00ebsimit ligjor nga shteti ose me pages\u00ebn n\u00eb vler\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e pamund\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb kthimit t\u00eb sendit, ose me nj\u00ebsi nd\u00ebrtimore n\u00eb rastet kur trualli investohen p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtim. N\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb t\u00eb faktit se nj\u00ebsit\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit t\u00eb pretenduara ishin ende n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb shtetit, gjykata e apelit duhet t\u2019i jap\u00eb n\u00eb rigjykim nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ezauruese k\u00ebrkimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye KCGJL vler\u00ebson se shkaqet e ngritura nga pala padit\u00ebse p\u00ebrmbajn\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb ligjit procedural e material. P\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb vendimi i k\u00ebsaj gjykate duhet t\u00eb prishet dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja t\u00eb kthehet p\u00ebr rishqyrtim pran\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit t\u00eb Juridiksionit t\u00eb P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm. Decision no. 00-2025-3686, dated 28.10.2025 of the Civil College In cases of illegal construction on the owner’s land by a public body, since the land estate has not vanished but has merged with the building to create a single item, the court must consider the landowner’s request for the recognition of property rights over specific parts of the building in the possession of the public body, rather than dismissing the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution (reivindicatio). With the decision of the Property Restitution and Compensation Commission of Shkodra Municipality, in favor of the heirs (of whom the plaintiff is part), a plot of land of 3910 m\u00b2 was returned, registered with the Shkodra Mortgage Office on 27.04.1994. By the Council of Territorial Regulation of Shkodra Municipality, on 16.06.1993, a construction permit was granted for a 6-story building with two sections, included in the land returned to the former owners. After the construction of the object, the National Housing Entity registered the title of ownership in its favor, and subsequently, the apartments included in the building in question were distributed to persons who benefit from the “homeless” status. The plaintiff approached the court with a lawsuit directed against the defendants, the Municipality of Shkodra and the Regional Directorate of the National Housing Entity, seeking the obligation to recognize the plaintiff as a co-owner of the constructed object. Court Reasoning The Shkodra District Court rejected the lawsuit, assessing that the construction is illegal. The Shkodra Court of Appeal decided to overturn the District Court’s decision, arguing that the plaintiff should have filed a claim for restitution. The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court (KCGJL) assesses that the dispute relates to the subjective right of ownership and its protection against illegal interventions by third parties or public bodies. According to Article 41 and following of the Constitution, several forms of compensation for the right of ownership are recognized, which are the result of legal expropriation by the state, either by payment in value in cases of impossibility of returning the object, or with construction units in cases where the land is invested for construction. Considering that the claimed service units were still owned by the state, the court of appeal must provide an exhaustive answer in the retrial to the plaintiff’s requests regarding whether or not they can judicially restore the subjective right of ownership over the land affected by the defendant’s construction, and whether they had chosen the appropriate procedural remedy to realize this right. Consequently, the decision of that court must be overturned and the case returned for retrial to the Court of Appeal of General Jurisdiction. Sentenza n. 00-2025-3686, del 28.10.2025 del Collegio Civile Nei casi di interventi illegali con costruzione sul terreno del proprietario da parte di un ente pubblico, dato che il bene immobile (terreno) non \u00e8 andato perduto, ma \u00e8 stato unito all’edificio creando un’unica entit\u00e0, il tribunale deve considerare la richiesta del proprietario del terreno per il riconoscimento del diritto di propriet\u00e0 su singole parti dell’edificio in possesso dell’ente pubblico, invece di respingere l’azione con la motivazione che il ricorrente avrebbe dovuto presentare un’azione di rivendicazione. Con la decisione della Commissione di Restituzione e Compensazione delle Propriet\u00e0 del Comune di Scutari, a favore degli eredi (di cui fa parte anche il ricorrente), \u00e8 stata restituita una superficie di terreno di 3910 m\u00b2, registrata presso l’Ufficio Ipotecario","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"7 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil","datePublished":"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"},"wordCount":1442,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-23T05:52:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-23T05:54:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2025-3686-473-date-28-10-2025-i-kolegjit-civil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2025-3686 (473), Dat\u00eb 28.10.2025 i Kolegjit Civil"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3981"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3981\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3988,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3981\/revisions\/3988"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}