Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght=0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --gold-dark: #a67c37;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n --cream-dark: #f5f2eb;\r\n }\r\n body {\r\n font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;\r\n background-color: var(--cream);\r\n color: var(--espresso);\r\n line-height: 1.8;\r\n }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n \/* Language switcher navigation styling *\/\r\n .lang-nav-container {\r\n width: 100%;\r\n display: flex;\r\n justify-content: center;\r\n margin-bottom: 2rem;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 768px) {\r\n .lang-nav-container {\r\n margin-bottom: 3rem;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n .lang-nav {\r\n display: inline-flex;\r\n background-color: var(--espresso);\r\n padding: 4px;\r\n border-radius: 9999px;\r\n border: 1px solid var(--gold);\r\n max-width: 100%;\r\n }\r\n .language-btn {\r\n padding: 6px 14px;\r\n border-radius: 9999px;\r\n font-size: 0.75rem;\r\n font-weight: 600;\r\n color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7);\r\n transition: all 0.3s ease;\r\n text-transform: uppercase;\r\n letter-spacing: 0.05em;\r\n cursor: pointer;\r\n border: none;\r\n background: transparent;\r\n white-space: nowrap;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 640px) {\r\n .language-btn {\r\n padding: 8px 24px;\r\n font-size: 0.875rem;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n .language-btn.active {\r\n background-color: var(--gold);\r\n color: white;\r\n box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);\r\n }\r\n\r\n \/* Responsive section display with smooth transitions *\/\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n\r\n @keyframes fadeIn {\r\n from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); }\r\n to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }\r\n }\r\n\r\n \/* Editorial large initial letter *\/\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter {\r\n float: left;\r\n font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif;\r\n font-size: 3.5rem;\r\n line-height: 2.8rem;\r\n padding-top: 4px;\r\n padding-right: 8px;\r\n color: var(--gold);\r\n font-weight: 700;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 640px) {\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter {\r\n font-size: 4.5rem;\r\n line-height: 3.5rem;\r\n padding-top: 8px;\r\n padding-right: 12px;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n\r\n p {\r\n margin-bottom: 1.5rem;\r\n color: #2d2d2d;\r\n font-size: 1rem;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 640px) {\r\n p {\r\n font-size: 1.125rem;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n \r\n \/* Premium comparison card design *\/\r\n .comparison-card {\r\n background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important;\r\n color: white !important;\r\n border: 1px solid rgba(197, 160, 89, 0.2);\r\n transition: transform 0.3s ease, border-color 0.3s ease;\r\n }\r\n .comparison-card:hover {\r\n transform: translateY(-4px);\r\n border-color: var(--gold);\r\n }\r\n .comparison-card .status-badge {\r\n display: inline-block;\r\n padding: 2px 10px;\r\n border-radius: 4px;\r\n font-size: 0.75rem;\r\n text-transform: uppercase;\r\n font-weight: bold;\r\n letter-spacing: 0.05em;\r\n margin-bottom: 1rem;\r\n }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 py-6 md:py-12\">\r\n \r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[240px] sm:h-[350px] md:h-[480px] rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-8 md:mb-12 border-b-4 border-gold\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" \r\n src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/6077422\/pexels-photo-6077422.jpeg\" \r\n alt=\"Property Rights and Administrative Law Image\" \r\n class=\"w-full h-full object-cover object-center brightness-[0.65]\"\r\n >\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/95 via-black\/40 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-4 left-4 right-4 md:bottom-8 md:left-8 md:right-8 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-gold tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-[10px] sm:text-xs md:text-sm mb-1 md:mb-2\">Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-3xl md:text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\\\"switchLang('sq')\\\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Albanian<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\\\"switchLang('en')\\\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">English<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\\\"switchLang('it')\\\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">Italiano<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-2xl md:text-3xl text-brown-deep mb-6 md:mb-8 border-b border-gold\/20 pb-4 leading-snug\">Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm <strong>nr. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/strong>, dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>\u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\\\"bg-white p-5 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border-l-4 md:border-l-8 border-gold shadow-md my-8 md:my-10\\\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-lg sm:text-xl mb-3 md:mb-4 font-bold text-brown-deep\">Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb:<\/h3>\r\n <ul class=\"space-y-3 pl-3 md:pl-4 border-l border-gold\/30 italic text-espresso text-sm sm:text-base\">\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41):<\/strong> Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit:<\/strong> \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto:<\/strong> Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb.<\/li>\r\n <\/ul>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6 my-8 md:my-12\">\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-red-800 text-red-200\">Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">\u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-emerald-800 text-emerald-200\">Standardi Kushtetues<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Vlera Reale e Tregut<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"my-8 text-center\">\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"inline-flex items-center gap-2 bg-[#c5a059] hover:bg-[#a67c37] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-8 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs sm:text-sm tracking-wider uppercase border border-gold shadow-lg\">\r\n <span>Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs<\/span>\r\n <svg class=\"w-4 h-4\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\" stroke-width=\"2\" d=\"M14 5l7 7m0 0l-7 7m7-7H3\"><\/path><\/svg>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <p class=\"text-sm text-gray-500 italic mt-6\">#GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"bg-gold\/10 p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border border-gold\/30 my-8 md:my-12 flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between items-center gap-6\">\r\n <div class=\"w-full md:max-w-xl text-center md:text-left\">\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-bold text-brown-deep mb-2\">Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-700 mb-0\">Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"bg-[#2c1810] hover:bg-[#c5a059] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-6 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs tracking-wider uppercase text-center w-full md:w-auto border border-gold whitespace-nowrap\">\r\n na kontaktoni\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-2xl md:text-3xl text-brown-deep mb-6 md:mb-8 border-b border-gold\/20 pb-4 leading-snug\">Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">In its landmark judgment <strong>No. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/strong>, dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\\\"bg-white p-5 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border-l-4 md:border-l-8 border-gold shadow-md my-8 md:my-10\\\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-lg sm:text-xl mb-3 md:mb-4 font-bold text-brown-deep\">Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court:<\/h3>\r\n <ul class=\"space-y-3 pl-3 md:pl-4 border-l border-gold\/30 italic text-espresso text-sm sm:text-base\">\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Constitutional Mandate (Article 41):<\/strong> Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Proportionality Check:<\/strong> Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>De Facto Redress:<\/strong> When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area.<\/li>\r\n <\/ul>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court's decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6 my-8 md:my-12\">\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-red-800 text-red-200\">Overruled Practice<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Fixed Reference Tariffs<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-emerald-800 text-emerald-200\">Constitutional Standard<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Real Market Value<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"my-8 text-center\">\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"inline-flex items-center gap-2 bg-[#c5a059] hover:bg-[#a67c37] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-8 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs sm:text-sm tracking-wider uppercase border border-gold shadow-lg\">\r\n <span>Consult a Property Defense Attorney<\/span>\r\n <svg class=\"w-4 h-4\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\" stroke-width=\"2\" d=\"M14 5l7 7m0 0l-7 7m7-7H3\"><\/path><\/svg>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <p class=\"text-sm text-gray-500 italic mt-6\">#SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"bg-gold\/10 p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border border-gold\/30 my-8 md:my-12 flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between items-center gap-6\">\r\n <div class=\"w-full md:max-w-xl text-center md:text-left\">\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-bold text-brown-deep mb-2\">Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-700 mb-0\">Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"bg-[#2c1810] hover:bg-[#c5a059] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-6 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs tracking-wider uppercase text-center w-full md:w-auto border border-gold whitespace-nowrap\">\r\n contact us\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-2xl md:text-3xl text-brown-deep mb-6 md:mb-8 border-b border-gold\/20 pb-4 leading-snug\">Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Nella sua storica sentenza <strong>n. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/strong>, datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l'esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d'Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\\\"bg-white p-5 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border-l-4 md:border-l-8 border-gold shadow-md my-8 md:my-10\\\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-lg sm:text-xl mb-3 md:mb-4 font-bold text-brown-deep\">Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema:<\/h3>\r\n <ul class=\"space-y-3 pl-3 md:pl-4 border-l border-gold\/30 italic text-espresso text-sm sm:text-base\">\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41):<\/strong> Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0:<\/strong> I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Estensione dell'Esproprio De Facto:<\/strong> Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l'intero valore economico del bene occupato.<\/li>\r\n <\/ul>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d'appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, dando priorit\u00e0 alla tutela sostanziale dei diritti di propriet\u00e0 privata.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6 my-8 md:my-12\">\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-red-800 text-red-200\">Pratica Respinta<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Tariffe Fisse di Riferimento<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Il calcolo dell'indennizzo basato esclusivamente su indici tabellari fissi (VKM), che ignora la realt\u00e0 economica e causa una palese sproporzione.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-emerald-800 text-emerald-200\">Standard Costituzionale<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Valore Reale di Mercato<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Una valutazione obiettiva ancorata ai prezzi correnti del mercato libero, garantendo un ristoro finanziario integrale per tutta la superficie occupata de facto.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"my-8 text-center\">\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"inline-flex items-center gap-2 bg-[#c5a059] hover:bg-[#a67c37] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-8 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs sm:text-sm tracking-wider uppercase border border-gold shadow-lg\">\r\n <span>Consultate un Avvocato Esperto in Diritti Reali<\/span>\r\n <svg class=\"w-4 h-4\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\" stroke-width=\"2\" d=\"M14 5l7 7m0 0l-7 7m7-7H3\"><\/path><\/svg>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <p class=\"text-sm text-gray-500 italic mt-6\">#CorteSuprema #DirittoAmministrativo #EsproprioDeFacto #DirittiReali #Costituzione #ValoreDiMercato #PetaniLawTax<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"bg-gold\/10 p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border border-gold\/30 my-8 md:my-12 flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between items-center gap-6\">\r\n <div class=\"w-full md:max-w-xl text-center md:text-left\">\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-bold text-brown-deep mb-2\">Assistenza Legale in Materia di Espropri e Propriet\u00e0<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-700 mb-0\">Contattate lo studio Petani Law & Tax per consulenza specializzata, rappresentanza strategica in contenziosi amministrativi e stima obiettiva del danno patrimoniale.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"bg-[#2c1810] hover:bg-[#c5a059] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-6 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs tracking-wider uppercase text-center w-full md:w-auto border border-gold whitespace-nowrap\">\r\n contattaci\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all language content sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(section => {\r\n section.classList.remove('active');\r\n });\r\n \r\n \/\/ Show only the selected content section\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \r\n \/\/ Reset active styles on all buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(btn => {\r\n btn.classList.remove('active');\r\n });\r\n \r\n \/\/ Set active state on the clicked language button\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n\r\n \/\/ Scroll gently back to the language selector container to maintain perspective\r\n window.scrollTo({\r\n top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20,\r\n behavior: 'smooth'\r\n });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto – Petani Law & Tax Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18) Albanian English Italiano Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare. \u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik. Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008. Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb: \u2022 Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41): Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb. \u2022 Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs. \u2022 Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto: Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb. Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private. Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar \u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar. Standardi Kushtetues Vlera Reale e Tregut Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto. Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs #GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror. na kontaktoni Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations In its landmark judgment No. 00-2026-802 (18), dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables. The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete. While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008. Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court: \u2022 Constitutional Mandate (Article 41): Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions. \u2022 Proportionality Check: Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value. \u2022 De Facto Redress: When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area. The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court’s decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights. Overruled Practice Fixed Reference Tariffs Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice. Constitutional Standard Real Market Value An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto. Consult a Property Defense Attorney #SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal. contact us Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto Nella sua storica sentenza n. 00-2026-802 (18), datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali. La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l’esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica. Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d’Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008. Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema: \u2022 Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41): Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato. \u2022 Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0: I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale. \u2022 Estensione dell’Esproprio De Facto: Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l’intero valore economico del bene occupato. La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d’appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado,<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3882","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto – Petani Law & Tax Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18) Albanian English Italiano Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare. \u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik. Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008. Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb: \u2022 Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41): Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb. \u2022 Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs. \u2022 Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto: Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb. Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private. Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar \u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar. Standardi Kushtetues Vlera Reale e Tregut Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto. Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs #GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror. na kontaktoni Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations In its landmark judgment No. 00-2026-802 (18), dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables. The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete. While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008. Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court: \u2022 Constitutional Mandate (Article 41): Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions. \u2022 Proportionality Check: Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value. \u2022 De Facto Redress: When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area. The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court’s decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights. Overruled Practice Fixed Reference Tariffs Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice. Constitutional Standard Real Market Value An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto. Consult a Property Defense Attorney #SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal. contact us Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto Nella sua storica sentenza n. 00-2026-802 (18), datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali. La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l’esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica. Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d’Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008. Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema: \u2022 Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41): Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato. \u2022 Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0: I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale. \u2022 Estensione dell’Esproprio De Facto: Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l’intero valore economico del bene occupato. La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d’appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1185,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto – Petani Law & Tax Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18) Albanian English Italiano Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare. \u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik. Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008. Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb: \u2022 Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41): Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb. \u2022 Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs. \u2022 Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto: Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb. Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private. Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar \u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar. Standardi Kushtetues Vlera Reale e Tregut Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto. Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs #GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror. na kontaktoni Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations In its landmark judgment No. 00-2026-802 (18), dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables. The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete. While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008. Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court: \u2022 Constitutional Mandate (Article 41): Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions. \u2022 Proportionality Check: Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value. \u2022 De Facto Redress: When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area. The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court’s decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights. Overruled Practice Fixed Reference Tariffs Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice. Constitutional Standard Real Market Value An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto. Consult a Property Defense Attorney #SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal. contact us Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto Nella sua storica sentenza n. 00-2026-802 (18), datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali. La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l’esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica. Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d’Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008. Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema: \u2022 Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41): Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato. \u2022 Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0: I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale. \u2022 Estensione dell’Esproprio De Facto: Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l’intero valore economico del bene occupato. La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d’appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ","datePublished":"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"wordCount":1185,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3882"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3887,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3882\/revisions\/3887"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto - Petani Law & Tax<\/title>\r\n <script src=\"https:\/\/cdn.tailwindcss.com\"><\/script>\r\n <link href=\"https:\/\/fonts.googleapis.com\/css2?family=Inter:wght@300;400;500;600;700&family=Playfair+Display:ital,wght=0,400;0,600;0,700;1,400;1,700&display=swap\" rel=\"stylesheet\">\r\n \r\n <style>\r\n :root {\r\n --gold: #c5a059;\r\n --gold-light: #dfc493;\r\n --gold-dark: #a67c37;\r\n --espresso: #1a0f0a;\r\n --brown-deep: #2c1810;\r\n --cream: #fdfcf9;\r\n --cream-dark: #f5f2eb;\r\n }\r\n body {\r\n font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;\r\n background-color: var(--cream);\r\n color: var(--espresso);\r\n line-height: 1.8;\r\n }\r\n .serif { font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif; }\r\n \r\n \/* Language switcher navigation styling *\/\r\n .lang-nav-container {\r\n width: 100%;\r\n display: flex;\r\n justify-content: center;\r\n margin-bottom: 2rem;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 768px) {\r\n .lang-nav-container {\r\n margin-bottom: 3rem;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n .lang-nav {\r\n display: inline-flex;\r\n background-color: var(--espresso);\r\n padding: 4px;\r\n border-radius: 9999px;\r\n border: 1px solid var(--gold);\r\n max-width: 100%;\r\n }\r\n .language-btn {\r\n padding: 6px 14px;\r\n border-radius: 9999px;\r\n font-size: 0.75rem;\r\n font-weight: 600;\r\n color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7);\r\n transition: all 0.3s ease;\r\n text-transform: uppercase;\r\n letter-spacing: 0.05em;\r\n cursor: pointer;\r\n border: none;\r\n background: transparent;\r\n white-space: nowrap;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 640px) {\r\n .language-btn {\r\n padding: 8px 24px;\r\n font-size: 0.875rem;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n .language-btn.active {\r\n background-color: var(--gold);\r\n color: white;\r\n box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);\r\n }\r\n\r\n \/* Responsive section display with smooth transitions *\/\r\n .content-section { display: none; }\r\n .content-section.active { display: block; animation: fadeIn 0.6s ease-out; }\r\n\r\n @keyframes fadeIn {\r\n from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(15px); }\r\n to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }\r\n }\r\n\r\n \/* Editorial large initial letter *\/\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter {\r\n float: left;\r\n font-family: 'Playfair Display', serif;\r\n font-size: 3.5rem;\r\n line-height: 2.8rem;\r\n padding-top: 4px;\r\n padding-right: 8px;\r\n color: var(--gold);\r\n font-weight: 700;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 640px) {\r\n .drop-cap::first-letter {\r\n font-size: 4.5rem;\r\n line-height: 3.5rem;\r\n padding-top: 8px;\r\n padding-right: 12px;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n\r\n p {\r\n margin-bottom: 1.5rem;\r\n color: #2d2d2d;\r\n font-size: 1rem;\r\n }\r\n @media (min-width: 640px) {\r\n p {\r\n font-size: 1.125rem;\r\n }\r\n }\r\n \r\n \/* Premium comparison card design *\/\r\n .comparison-card {\r\n background-color: var(--brown-deep) !important;\r\n color: white !important;\r\n border: 1px solid rgba(197, 160, 89, 0.2);\r\n transition: transform 0.3s ease, border-color 0.3s ease;\r\n }\r\n .comparison-card:hover {\r\n transform: translateY(-4px);\r\n border-color: var(--gold);\r\n }\r\n .comparison-card .status-badge {\r\n display: inline-block;\r\n padding: 2px 10px;\r\n border-radius: 4px;\r\n font-size: 0.75rem;\r\n text-transform: uppercase;\r\n font-weight: bold;\r\n letter-spacing: 0.05em;\r\n margin-bottom: 1rem;\r\n }\r\n <\/style>\r\n<\/head>\r\n<body class=\"antialiased\">\r\n\r\n <main class=\"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 py-6 md:py-12\">\r\n \r\n \r\n <div class=\"relative w-full h-[240px] sm:h-[350px] md:h-[480px] rounded-2xl md:rounded-3xl overflow-hidden shadow-2xl mb-8 md:mb-12 border-b-4 border-gold\">\r\n <img decoding=\"async\" \r\n src=\"https:\/\/images.pexels.com\/photos\/6077422\/pexels-photo-6077422.jpeg\" \r\n alt=\"Property Rights and Administrative Law Image\" \r\n class=\"w-full h-full object-cover object-center brightness-[0.65]\"\r\n >\r\n <div class=\"absolute inset-0 bg-gradient-to-t from-black\/95 via-black\/40 to-transparent\"><\/div>\r\n <div class=\"absolute bottom-4 left-4 right-4 md:bottom-8 md:left-8 md:right-8 text-white\">\r\n <p class=\"text-gold tracking-widest uppercase font-semibold text-[10px] sm:text-xs md:text-sm mb-1 md:mb-2\">Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs<\/p>\r\n <h1 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-3xl md:text-4xl font-bold leading-tight\">Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/h1>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"lang-nav-container sticky top-4 z-50\">\r\n <div class=\"lang-nav shadow-2xl backdrop-blur-md bg-[#1a0f0a]\/95\">\r\n <button onclick=\\\"switchLang('sq')\\\" id=\"btn-sq\" class=\"language-btn active\">Albanian<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\\\"switchLang('en')\\\" id=\"btn-en\" class=\"language-btn\">English<\/button>\r\n <button onclick=\\\"switchLang('it')\\\" id=\"btn-it\" class=\"language-btn\">Italiano<\/button>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-sq\" class=\"content-section active\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-2xl md:text-3xl text-brown-deep mb-6 md:mb-8 border-b border-gold\/20 pb-4 leading-snug\">Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm <strong>nr. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/strong>, dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>\u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\\\"bg-white p-5 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border-l-4 md:border-l-8 border-gold shadow-md my-8 md:my-10\\\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-lg sm:text-xl mb-3 md:mb-4 font-bold text-brown-deep\">Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb:<\/h3>\r\n <ul class=\"space-y-3 pl-3 md:pl-4 border-l border-gold\/30 italic text-espresso text-sm sm:text-base\">\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41):<\/strong> Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit:<\/strong> \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto:<\/strong> Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb.<\/li>\r\n <\/ul>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6 my-8 md:my-12\">\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-red-800 text-red-200\">Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">\u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-emerald-800 text-emerald-200\">Standardi Kushtetues<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Vlera Reale e Tregut<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"my-8 text-center\">\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"inline-flex items-center gap-2 bg-[#c5a059] hover:bg-[#a67c37] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-8 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs sm:text-sm tracking-wider uppercase border border-gold shadow-lg\">\r\n <span>Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs<\/span>\r\n <svg class=\"w-4 h-4\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\" stroke-width=\"2\" d=\"M14 5l7 7m0 0l-7 7m7-7H3\"><\/path><\/svg>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <p class=\"text-sm text-gray-500 italic mt-6\">#GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"bg-gold\/10 p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border border-gold\/30 my-8 md:my-12 flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between items-center gap-6\">\r\n <div class=\"w-full md:max-w-xl text-center md:text-left\">\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-bold text-brown-deep mb-2\">Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-700 mb-0\">Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"bg-[#2c1810] hover:bg-[#c5a059] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-6 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs tracking-wider uppercase text-center w-full md:w-auto border border-gold whitespace-nowrap\">\r\n na kontaktoni\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-en\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-2xl md:text-3xl text-brown-deep mb-6 md:mb-8 border-b border-gold\/20 pb-4 leading-snug\">Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">In its landmark judgment <strong>No. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/strong>, dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\\\"bg-white p-5 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border-l-4 md:border-l-8 border-gold shadow-md my-8 md:my-10\\\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-lg sm:text-xl mb-3 md:mb-4 font-bold text-brown-deep\">Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court:<\/h3>\r\n <ul class=\"space-y-3 pl-3 md:pl-4 border-l border-gold\/30 italic text-espresso text-sm sm:text-base\">\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Constitutional Mandate (Article 41):<\/strong> Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Proportionality Check:<\/strong> Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>De Facto Redress:<\/strong> When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area.<\/li>\r\n <\/ul>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court's decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6 my-8 md:my-12\">\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-red-800 text-red-200\">Overruled Practice<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Fixed Reference Tariffs<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-emerald-800 text-emerald-200\">Constitutional Standard<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Real Market Value<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"my-8 text-center\">\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"inline-flex items-center gap-2 bg-[#c5a059] hover:bg-[#a67c37] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-8 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs sm:text-sm tracking-wider uppercase border border-gold shadow-lg\">\r\n <span>Consult a Property Defense Attorney<\/span>\r\n <svg class=\"w-4 h-4\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\" stroke-width=\"2\" d=\"M14 5l7 7m0 0l-7 7m7-7H3\"><\/path><\/svg>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <p class=\"text-sm text-gray-500 italic mt-6\">#SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"bg-gold\/10 p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border border-gold\/30 my-8 md:my-12 flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between items-center gap-6\">\r\n <div class=\"w-full md:max-w-xl text-center md:text-left\">\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-bold text-brown-deep mb-2\">Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-700 mb-0\">Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"bg-[#2c1810] hover:bg-[#c5a059] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-6 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs tracking-wider uppercase text-center w-full md:w-auto border border-gold whitespace-nowrap\">\r\n contact us\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n \r\n <article id=\"lang-it\" class=\"content-section\">\r\n <h2 class=\"serif text-xl sm:text-2xl md:text-3xl text-brown-deep mb-6 md:mb-8 border-b border-gold\/20 pb-4 leading-snug\">Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto<\/h2>\r\n \r\n <p class=\"drop-cap\">Nella sua storica sentenza <strong>n. 00-2026-802 (18)<\/strong>, datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l'esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <p>Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d'Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008.<\/p>\r\n\r\n <div class=\\\"bg-white p-5 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border-l-4 md:border-l-8 border-gold shadow-md my-8 md:my-10\\\">\r\n <h3 class=\"serif text-lg sm:text-xl mb-3 md:mb-4 font-bold text-brown-deep\">Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema:<\/h3>\r\n <ul class=\"space-y-3 pl-3 md:pl-4 border-l border-gold\/30 italic text-espresso text-sm sm:text-base\">\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41):<\/strong> Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0:<\/strong> I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale.<\/li>\r\n <li>\u2022 <strong>Estensione dell'Esproprio De Facto:<\/strong> Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l'intero valore economico del bene occupato.<\/li>\r\n <\/ul>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n <p>La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d'appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado, dando priorit\u00e0 alla tutela sostanziale dei diritti di propriet\u00e0 privata.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6 my-8 md:my-12\">\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-red-800 text-red-200\">Pratica Respinta<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Tariffe Fisse di Riferimento<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Il calcolo dell'indennizzo basato esclusivamente su indici tabellari fissi (VKM), che ignora la realt\u00e0 economica e causa una palese sproporzione.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <div class=\"comparison-card p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl shadow-xl flex flex-col justify-between\">\r\n <div>\r\n <span class=\"status-badge bg-emerald-800 text-emerald-200\">Standard Costituzionale<\/span>\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-semibold mb-2 sm:mb-3 text-gold-light\">Valore Reale di Mercato<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-300 mb-0\">Una valutazione obiettiva ancorata ai prezzi correnti del mercato libero, garantendo un ristoro finanziario integrale per tutta la superficie occupata de facto.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"my-8 text-center\">\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"inline-flex items-center gap-2 bg-[#c5a059] hover:bg-[#a67c37] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-8 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs sm:text-sm tracking-wider uppercase border border-gold shadow-lg\">\r\n <span>Consultate un Avvocato Esperto in Diritti Reali<\/span>\r\n <svg class=\"w-4 h-4\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"currentColor\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\" stroke-width=\"2\" d=\"M14 5l7 7m0 0l-7 7m7-7H3\"><\/path><\/svg>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n\r\n \r\n <p class=\"text-sm text-gray-500 italic mt-6\">#CorteSuprema #DirittoAmministrativo #EsproprioDeFacto #DirittiReali #Costituzione #ValoreDiMercato #PetaniLawTax<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\n <div class=\"bg-gold\/10 p-6 sm:p-8 rounded-xl md:rounded-2xl border border-gold\/30 my-8 md:my-12 flex flex-col md:flex-row justify-between items-center gap-6\">\r\n <div class=\"w-full md:max-w-xl text-center md:text-left\">\r\n <h4 class=\"serif text-base sm:text-lg font-bold text-brown-deep mb-2\">Assistenza Legale in Materia di Espropri e Propriet\u00e0<\/h4>\r\n <p class=\"text-xs sm:text-sm text-gray-700 mb-0\">Contattate lo studio Petani Law & Tax per consulenza specializzata, rappresentanza strategica in contenziosi amministrativi e stima obiettiva del danno patrimoniale.<\/p>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/contact\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"bg-[#2c1810] hover:bg-[#c5a059] text-white font-semibold py-3 px-6 rounded-full transition-colors duration-300 text-xs tracking-wider uppercase text-center w-full md:w-auto border border-gold whitespace-nowrap\">\r\n contattaci\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/article>\r\n\r\n <\/main>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function switchLang(lang) {\r\n \/\/ Hide all language content sections\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.content-section').forEach(section => {\r\n section.classList.remove('active');\r\n });\r\n \r\n \/\/ Show only the selected content section\r\n document.getElementById('lang-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n \r\n \/\/ Reset active styles on all buttons\r\n document.querySelectorAll('.language-btn').forEach(btn => {\r\n btn.classList.remove('active');\r\n });\r\n \r\n \/\/ Set active state on the clicked language button\r\n document.getElementById('btn-' + lang).classList.add('active');\r\n\r\n \/\/ Scroll gently back to the language selector container to maintain perspective\r\n window.scrollTo({\r\n top: document.querySelector('.lang-nav-container').offsetTop - 20,\r\n behavior: 'smooth'\r\n });\r\n }\r\n <\/script>\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto – Petani Law & Tax Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18) Albanian English Italiano Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare. \u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik. Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008. Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb: \u2022 Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41): Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb. \u2022 Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs. \u2022 Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto: Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb. Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private. Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar \u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar. Standardi Kushtetues Vlera Reale e Tregut Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto. Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs #GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror. na kontaktoni Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations In its landmark judgment No. 00-2026-802 (18), dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables. The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete. While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008. Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court: \u2022 Constitutional Mandate (Article 41): Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions. \u2022 Proportionality Check: Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value. \u2022 De Facto Redress: When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area. The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court’s decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights. Overruled Practice Fixed Reference Tariffs Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice. Constitutional Standard Real Market Value An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto. Consult a Property Defense Attorney #SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal. contact us Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto Nella sua storica sentenza n. 00-2026-802 (18), datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali. La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l’esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica. Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d’Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008. Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema: \u2022 Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41): Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato. \u2022 Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0: I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale. \u2022 Estensione dell’Esproprio De Facto: Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l’intero valore economico del bene occupato. La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d’appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado,<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3882","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sq_AL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto – Petani Law & Tax Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18) Albanian English Italiano Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare. \u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik. Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008. Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb: \u2022 Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41): Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb. \u2022 Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs. \u2022 Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto: Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb. Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private. Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar \u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar. Standardi Kushtetues Vlera Reale e Tregut Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto. Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs #GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror. na kontaktoni Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations In its landmark judgment No. 00-2026-802 (18), dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables. The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete. While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008. Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court: \u2022 Constitutional Mandate (Article 41): Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions. \u2022 Proportionality Check: Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value. \u2022 De Facto Redress: When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area. The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court’s decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights. Overruled Practice Fixed Reference Tariffs Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice. Constitutional Standard Real Market Value An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto. Consult a Property Defense Attorney #SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal. contact us Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto Nella sua storica sentenza n. 00-2026-802 (18), datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali. La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l’esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica. Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d’Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008. Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema: \u2022 Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41): Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato. \u2022 Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0: I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale. \u2022 Estensione dell’Esproprio De Facto: Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l’intero valore economico del bene occupato. La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d’appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1185,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\",\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sq\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sq\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_locale":"sq_AL","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802: Shpron\u00ebsimet De Facto – Petani Law & Tax Jurisprudenca Shqiptare \u2022 Kolegji Administrativ \u2022 E Drejta e Pron\u00ebs Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18) Albanian English Italiano Kolegji Administrativ: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb mposhtin vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb tregut n\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimet de facto N\u00eb vendimin e tij t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026, Kolegji Administrativ i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb ka sakt\u00ebsuar standardin kushtetues t\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb n\u00eb rastet e shpron\u00ebsimeve de facto, duke vendosur supremacin\u00eb e vler\u00ebs reale t\u00eb tregut mbi tabelat tarifore qeveritare. \u00c7\u00ebshtja trajtonte situat\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pronari privat, pasuria e t\u00eb cilit ishte z\u00ebn\u00eb pothuajse t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht nga nd\u00ebrtimi i nj\u00eb segmenti rrugor publik, ndon\u00ebse formalisht p\u00ebrmes nj\u00eb Vendimi t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave (VKM) ishte shpron\u00ebsuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e saj. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, pjesa e mbetur e pasuris\u00eb ishte nxjerr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit funksional e ekonomik. Nd\u00ebrsa Gjykata Administrative e Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb Durr\u00ebs kishte zbatuar drejt standardin e shp\u00ebrblimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb duke akorduar d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim bazuar n\u00eb vler\u00ebn e tregut, Gjykata Administrative e Apelit e kishte ulur k\u00ebt\u00eb mas\u00eb, duke e p\u00ebrllogaritur d\u00ebmin sipas \u00e7mimeve referuese tarifore t\u00eb VKM nr. 1620\/2008. Parimet e konfirmuara nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb: \u2022 Standardi Kushtetues (Neni 41): Shp\u00ebrblimi i drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr pron\u00ebn e shpron\u00ebsuar duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb real, efektiv dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje t\u00eb plot\u00eb me kushtet e tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb. \u2022 Ndalimi i Disproporcionalitetit: \u00c7mimet referuese t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren kur krijojn\u00eb disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar me vler\u00ebn reale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs. \u2022 Gjer\u00ebsia e Shpron\u00ebsimit De Facto: Kur shteti merr pron\u00ebn p\u00ebr interes publik p\u00ebrtej sip\u00ebrfaqes s\u00eb shpron\u00ebsuar formalisht, subjekti ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb vler\u00ebn e plot\u00eb t\u00eb pasuris\u00eb s\u00eb z\u00ebn\u00eb. Kolegji Administrativ prishi vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Apelit dhe la n\u00eb fuqi vendimin e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi mbrojtjes substanciale t\u00eb pron\u00ebs private. Praktika e Rr\u00ebzuar \u00c7mimet Tarifore Referuese P\u00ebrllogaritja e d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblimit sipas tabelave fikse t\u00eb akteve n\u00ebnligjore (VKM), e cila injoron realitetin ekonomik dhe krijon disproporcionalitet t\u00eb theksuar. Standardi Kushtetues Vlera Reale e Tregut Vler\u00ebsimi objektiv i pasuris\u00eb bazuar mbi \u00e7mimet aktuale t\u00eb tregut t\u00eb lir\u00eb, duke garantuar nj\u00eb d\u00ebmshp\u00ebrblim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sip\u00ebrfaqen e z\u00ebn\u00eb de facto. Konsultoni nj\u00eb Avokat p\u00ebr \u00c7\u00ebshtjet e Pron\u00ebs #GjykataELarte #KolegjiAdministrativ #Shpron\u00ebsimDeFacto #EDrejtaEPron\u00ebs #Kushtetuta #VleraETregut #PetaniLawTax Asistenc\u00eb Ligjore mbi Shpron\u00ebsimet dhe t\u00eb Drejtat Reale Na kontaktoni pran\u00eb Petani Law & Tax p\u00ebr konsulenc\u00eb t\u00eb specializuar, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim gjyq\u00ebsor n\u00eb konteste administrative dhe vler\u00ebsim objektiv t\u00eb d\u00ebmit tuaj pasuror. na kontaktoni Administrative Chamber: Sub-legal reference tariffs cannot override real market value in de facto expropriations In its landmark judgment No. 00-2026-802 (18), dated 21.01.2026, the Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court clarified the constitutional standard of just compensation in cases of de facto expropriation, establishing the supremacy of real market value over standardized government tables. The dispute involved a private owner whose property was almost entirely occupied by the construction of a public road segment, even though a formal Council of Ministers Decision (VKM) had targeted only a small portion. Furthermore, the remaining piece of land was left functionally and economically obsolete. While the First Instance Administrative Court of Durr\u00ebs correctly applied the constitutional standard by granting compensation based on open-market value, the Administrative Court of Appeal reduced the amount, calculating the damage under the restrictive reference rates of VKM No. 1620\/2008. Legal Principles Established by the Supreme Court: \u2022 Constitutional Mandate (Article 41): Just compensation for expropriated property must be authentic, real, and fully aligned with free-market conditions. \u2022 Proportionality Check: Standardized reference tariffs from executive decrees cannot be applied if they result in a severe disparity against the actual economic value. \u2022 De Facto Redress: When the State physically seizes land for public utility beyond formal decrees, the owner is entitled to full indemnification for the entire occupied area. The Administrative Chamber overturned the appellate court’s decision and reinstated the first-instance ruling, prioritizing the substantive protection of private property rights. Overruled Practice Fixed Reference Tariffs Calculating compensation strictly via standard sub-legal indices (VKM), which completely disregards financial reality and causes manifest injustice. Constitutional Standard Real Market Value An objective appraisal rooted in actual free-market transactions, securing full and fair restitution for the entire area seized de facto. Consult a Property Defense Attorney #SupremeCourt #AdministrativeChamber #DeFactoExpropriation #PropertyRights #Constitution #MarketValue #PetaniLawTax Legal Counsel on Expropriation and Property Disputes Contact us at Petani Law & Tax for specialized counsel, strategic court representation in administrative disputes, and objective financial damage appraisal. contact us Sezione Amministrativa: Le tariffe secondarie di riferimento non possono superare il valore reale di mercato negli espropri de facto Nella sua storica sentenza n. 00-2026-802 (18), datata 21.01.2026, la Sezione Amministrativa della Corte Suprema ha chiarito lo standard costituzionale del giusto indennizzo nei casi di esproprio de facto, sancendo la supremazia del valore reale di mercato sulle tabelle tariffarie statali. La controversia riguardava un proprietario privato il cui immobile era stato quasi interamente occupato per la costruzione di un tratto stradale pubblico, nonostante il decreto formale del Consiglio dei Ministri (VKM) avesse previsto l’esproprio solo per una minima frazione. Inoltre, la parte residua del terreno era stata lasciata in uno stato di totale inutilizzabilit\u00e0 economica. Mentre il Tribunale Amministrativo di Primo Grado di Durazzo aveva applicato correttamente lo standard costituzionale assegnando un risarcimento basato sul valore commerciale, la Corte d’Appello Amministrativa aveva ridotto tale importo, calcolando il danno secondo le tariffe fisse della delibera VKM n. 1620\/2008. Principi Giuridici Sanciti dalla Corte Suprema: \u2022 Mandato Costituzionale (Articolo 41): Il giusto indennizzo per la propriet\u00e0 espropriata deve essere effettivo, reale e pienamente rispondente alle condizioni del libero mercato. \u2022 Divieto di Disproporzionalit\u00e0: I prezzi amministrativi di riferimento non possono essere applicati quando determinano un evidente e ingiusto divario rispetto al valore commerciale. \u2022 Estensione dell’Esproprio De Facto: Quando lo Stato acquisisce materialmente un bene oltre i limiti dei decreti formali, il soggetto ha il diritto di richiedere l’intero valore economico del bene occupato. La Sezione Amministrativa ha annullato la sentenza d’appello e ha confermato la decisione di primo grado,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stafi","Est. reading time":"6 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ","datePublished":"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"},"wordCount":1185,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/","name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-09T06:48:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-09T06:51:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sq","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/case-studies-petani-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":2560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/vendimi-nr-00-2026-802-18-date-21-01-2026-i-kolegjit-administrativ\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vendimi nr. 00-2026-802 (18), dat\u00eb 21.01.2026 i Kolegjit Administrativ"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sq"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sq","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3882"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3887,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3882\/revisions\/3887"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}