{"id":3322,"date":"2025-12-26T18:32:55","date_gmt":"2025-12-26T18:32:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/?p=3322"},"modified":"2026-02-12T12:25:05","modified_gmt":"2026-02-12T12:25:05","slug":"titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/","title":{"rendered":"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gjykata mund t\u00eb rikualifikoj\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin fakt q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb akuz\u00eb apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim dhe jo nj\u00eb fakt t\u00eb ri, i cili p\u00ebrmban elemente apo rrethana t\u00eb reja q\u00eb nuk i jan\u00eb njoftuar t\u00eb pandehurit apo p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat prokuroria nuk ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale.<br \/>\nKolegji v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se, me \u201cfakt q\u00eb rezulton ndryshe\u201d duhet t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb nj\u00eb fakt q\u00eb paraqitet ndryshe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsore, nga ai i parashtruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim.<br \/>\nE th\u00ebn\u00eb ndryshe, gjykata n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebnies s\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, nuk legjitimohet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb ato veprime apo mosveprime t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit, t\u00eb cilat ndon\u00ebse rezultojn\u00eb gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor, nuk i jan\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb pandehurit me aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim.(&#8230;)<br \/>\nGjykata ushtron t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e saj p\u00ebr ndryshimin e cil\u00ebsimit juridik t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs penale, vet\u00ebm n\u00eb lidhje me faktin e p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim, q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar\/komunikuar t\u00eb pandehurit dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin prokuroria ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale, duke i atribuuar nj\u00eb akuz\u00eb konkrete.<br \/>\nKolegji rithekson se neni 372 rregullon rastin kur fakti penal (shkaku i akuz\u00ebs) rezulton gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor ndryshe nga sa \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkuar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykimin e t\u00eb pandehurit. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb zbatimin e nenit 375 t\u00eb K.Penal, fakti nuk ndryshon por cil\u00ebsimi juridik i tij (natyra e akuz\u00ebs) rivler\u00ebsohet nga gjykata n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimin jura novit curia (gjykata e njeh ligjin), pra fakti q\u00eb i atribuohet t\u00eb pandehurit nuk ndryshon dhe mbetet i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb. Fakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb \u201ci nj\u00ebjti fakt objektiv\u201d i cili karakterizohet nga te nj\u00ebjtat veprime, subjekte dhe objekt material.<br \/>\nPra, \u201cfakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb\u201d do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb fakti jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij t\u00eb jet\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, por edhe se asnj\u00eb element i tij p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs nuk duhet t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb i ndrysh\u00ebm nga ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb akuz\u00ebn e paraqitur nga prokurori.<br \/>\nKolegji konstaton se fakti penal q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb gjykuarit E.A.n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces penal, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim \u2013 vjedhje me dhun\u00eb t\u00eb sendit aparat celular duke p\u00ebrdorur nj\u00eb send n\u00eb dukje si arm\u00eb(&#8230;)<br \/>\nAkuza \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshuar\/sakt\u00ebsuar nga prokurori vet\u00ebm gjat\u00eb konkluzioneve p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb parashtruara prej tij, duke pranuar q\u00eb akuza e vjedhjes me dhun\u00eb n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb gjykuarit nuk q\u00ebndron. Prokuroria n\u00eb konkluzionet p\u00ebrfundimtare ka pranuar q\u00ebndrimin e mbrojtjes(&#8230;)<br \/>\nKolegji vler\u00ebson jo t\u00eb drejt\u00eb e ligjor k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb prokurorit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, i cili n\u00eb thelb ka ndryshuar akuz\u00ebn n\u00eb diskutimin p\u00ebrfundimtar, ndon\u00ebse gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb gjendjen e akteve t\u00eb fashikullit hetimor, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb procedimit me gjykim t\u00eb shkurtuar.<br \/>\nKjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb shqyrtimi gjyq\u00ebsor i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes nuk ka ndikuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u201csakt\u00ebsim t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs\u201d nga prokurori, p\u00ebrsa koh\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikuar asnj\u00eb prov\u00eb apo rrethan\u00eb apo fakt i ri\/i ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb raport me aktet\/provat e p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb fashikullin e hetimeve (pik\u00ebrisht pasi gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar mbi aktet e hetimit)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/1760895186454.pdf\">1760895186454<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gjykata mund t\u00eb rikualifikoj\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin fakt q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb akuz\u00eb apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim dhe jo nj\u00eb fakt t\u00eb ri, i cili p\u00ebrmban elemente apo rrethana t\u00eb reja q\u00eb nuk i jan\u00eb njoftuar t\u00eb pandehurit apo p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat prokuroria nuk ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale. Kolegji v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se, me \u201cfakt q\u00eb rezulton ndryshe\u201d duhet t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb nj\u00eb fakt q\u00eb paraqitet ndryshe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsore, nga ai i parashtruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim. E th\u00ebn\u00eb ndryshe, gjykata n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebnies s\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, nuk legjitimohet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb ato veprime apo mosveprime t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit, t\u00eb cilat ndon\u00ebse rezultojn\u00eb gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor, nuk i jan\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb pandehurit me aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim.(&#8230;) Gjykata ushtron t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e saj p\u00ebr ndryshimin e cil\u00ebsimit juridik t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs penale, vet\u00ebm n\u00eb lidhje me faktin e p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim, q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar\/komunikuar t\u00eb pandehurit dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin prokuroria ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale, duke i atribuuar nj\u00eb akuz\u00eb konkrete. Kolegji rithekson se neni 372 rregullon rastin kur fakti penal (shkaku i akuz\u00ebs) rezulton gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor ndryshe nga sa \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkuar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykimin e t\u00eb pandehurit. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb zbatimin e nenit 375 t\u00eb K.Penal, fakti nuk ndryshon por cil\u00ebsimi juridik i tij (natyra e akuz\u00ebs) rivler\u00ebsohet nga gjykata n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimin jura novit curia (gjykata e njeh ligjin), pra fakti q\u00eb i atribuohet t\u00eb pandehurit nuk ndryshon dhe mbetet i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb. Fakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb \u201ci nj\u00ebjti fakt objektiv\u201d i cili karakterizohet nga te nj\u00ebjtat veprime, subjekte dhe objekt material. Pra, \u201cfakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb\u201d do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb fakti jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij t\u00eb jet\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, por edhe se asnj\u00eb element i tij p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs nuk duhet t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb i ndrysh\u00ebm nga ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb akuz\u00ebn e paraqitur nga prokurori. Kolegji konstaton se fakti penal q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb gjykuarit E.A.n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces penal, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim \u2013 vjedhje me dhun\u00eb t\u00eb sendit aparat celular duke p\u00ebrdorur nj\u00eb send n\u00eb dukje si arm\u00eb(&#8230;) Akuza \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshuar\/sakt\u00ebsuar nga prokurori vet\u00ebm gjat\u00eb konkluzioneve p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb parashtruara prej tij, duke pranuar q\u00eb akuza e vjedhjes me dhun\u00eb n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb gjykuarit nuk q\u00ebndron. Prokuroria n\u00eb konkluzionet p\u00ebrfundimtare ka pranuar q\u00ebndrimin e mbrojtjes(&#8230;) Kolegji vler\u00ebson jo t\u00eb drejt\u00eb e ligjor k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb prokurorit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, i cili n\u00eb thelb ka ndryshuar akuz\u00ebn n\u00eb diskutimin p\u00ebrfundimtar, ndon\u00ebse gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb gjendjen e akteve t\u00eb fashikullit hetimor, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb procedimit me gjykim t\u00eb shkurtuar. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb shqyrtimi gjyq\u00ebsor i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes nuk ka ndikuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u201csakt\u00ebsim t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs\u201d nga prokurori, p\u00ebrsa koh\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikuar asnj\u00eb prov\u00eb apo rrethan\u00eb apo fakt i ri\/i ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb raport me aktet\/provat e p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb fashikullin e hetimeve (pik\u00ebrisht pasi gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar mbi aktet e hetimit) 1760895186454<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2981,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-petani-blog"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal - Petani Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"it_IT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal - Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gjykata mund t\u00eb rikualifikoj\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin fakt q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb akuz\u00eb apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim dhe jo nj\u00eb fakt t\u00eb ri, i cili p\u00ebrmban elemente apo rrethana t\u00eb reja q\u00eb nuk i jan\u00eb njoftuar t\u00eb pandehurit apo p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat prokuroria nuk ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale. Kolegji v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se, me \u201cfakt q\u00eb rezulton ndryshe\u201d duhet t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb nj\u00eb fakt q\u00eb paraqitet ndryshe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsore, nga ai i parashtruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim. E th\u00ebn\u00eb ndryshe, gjykata n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebnies s\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, nuk legjitimohet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb ato veprime apo mosveprime t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit, t\u00eb cilat ndon\u00ebse rezultojn\u00eb gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor, nuk i jan\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb pandehurit me aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim.(&#8230;) Gjykata ushtron t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e saj p\u00ebr ndryshimin e cil\u00ebsimit juridik t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs penale, vet\u00ebm n\u00eb lidhje me faktin e p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim, q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar\/komunikuar t\u00eb pandehurit dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin prokuroria ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale, duke i atribuuar nj\u00eb akuz\u00eb konkrete. Kolegji rithekson se neni 372 rregullon rastin kur fakti penal (shkaku i akuz\u00ebs) rezulton gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor ndryshe nga sa \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkuar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykimin e t\u00eb pandehurit. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb zbatimin e nenit 375 t\u00eb K.Penal, fakti nuk ndryshon por cil\u00ebsimi juridik i tij (natyra e akuz\u00ebs) rivler\u00ebsohet nga gjykata n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimin jura novit curia (gjykata e njeh ligjin), pra fakti q\u00eb i atribuohet t\u00eb pandehurit nuk ndryshon dhe mbetet i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb. Fakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb \u201ci nj\u00ebjti fakt objektiv\u201d i cili karakterizohet nga te nj\u00ebjtat veprime, subjekte dhe objekt material. Pra, \u201cfakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb\u201d do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb fakti jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij t\u00eb jet\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, por edhe se asnj\u00eb element i tij p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs nuk duhet t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb i ndrysh\u00ebm nga ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb akuz\u00ebn e paraqitur nga prokurori. Kolegji konstaton se fakti penal q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb gjykuarit E.A.n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces penal, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim \u2013 vjedhje me dhun\u00eb t\u00eb sendit aparat celular duke p\u00ebrdorur nj\u00eb send n\u00eb dukje si arm\u00eb(&#8230;) Akuza \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshuar\/sakt\u00ebsuar nga prokurori vet\u00ebm gjat\u00eb konkluzioneve p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb parashtruara prej tij, duke pranuar q\u00eb akuza e vjedhjes me dhun\u00eb n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb gjykuarit nuk q\u00ebndron. Prokuroria n\u00eb konkluzionet p\u00ebrfundimtare ka pranuar q\u00ebndrimin e mbrojtjes(&#8230;) Kolegji vler\u00ebson jo t\u00eb drejt\u00eb e ligjor k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb prokurorit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, i cili n\u00eb thelb ka ndryshuar akuz\u00ebn n\u00eb diskutimin p\u00ebrfundimtar, ndon\u00ebse gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb gjendjen e akteve t\u00eb fashikullit hetimor, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb procedimit me gjykim t\u00eb shkurtuar. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb shqyrtimi gjyq\u00ebsor i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes nuk ka ndikuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u201csakt\u00ebsim t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs\u201d nga prokurori, p\u00ebrsa koh\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikuar asnj\u00eb prov\u00eb apo rrethan\u00eb apo fakt i ri\/i ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb raport me aktet\/provat e p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb fashikullin e hetimeve (pik\u00ebrisht pasi gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar mbi aktet e hetimit) 1760895186454\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Petani Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-26T18:32:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-12T12:25:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scritto da\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stafi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo di lettura stimato\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minuti\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\"},\"headline\":\"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-26T18:32:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-12T12:25:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":595,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Petani Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/\",\"name\":\"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal - Petani Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-26T18:32:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-12T12:25:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":1600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"description\":\"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Petani Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/04\\\/logo.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":155,\"caption\":\"Petani Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/sq\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90\",\"name\":\"Stafi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Stafi\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\\\/it\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal - Petani Law Firm","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/","og_locale":"it_IT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal - Petani Law Firm","og_description":"Gjykata mund t\u00eb rikualifikoj\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin fakt q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb akuz\u00eb apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim dhe jo nj\u00eb fakt t\u00eb ri, i cili p\u00ebrmban elemente apo rrethana t\u00eb reja q\u00eb nuk i jan\u00eb njoftuar t\u00eb pandehurit apo p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat prokuroria nuk ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale. Kolegji v\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se, me \u201cfakt q\u00eb rezulton ndryshe\u201d duhet t\u00eb kuptojm\u00eb nj\u00eb fakt q\u00eb paraqitet ndryshe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsore, nga ai i parashtruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim. E th\u00ebn\u00eb ndryshe, gjykata n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebnies s\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, nuk legjitimohet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb ato veprime apo mosveprime t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit, t\u00eb cilat ndon\u00ebse rezultojn\u00eb gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor, nuk i jan\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb pandehurit me aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs apo n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim.(&#8230;) Gjykata ushtron t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e saj p\u00ebr ndryshimin e cil\u00ebsimit juridik t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs penale, vet\u00ebm n\u00eb lidhje me faktin e p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim, q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar\/komunikuar t\u00eb pandehurit dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin prokuroria ka ushtruar ndjekjen penale, duke i atribuuar nj\u00eb akuz\u00eb konkrete. Kolegji rithekson se neni 372 rregullon rastin kur fakti penal (shkaku i akuz\u00ebs) rezulton gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor ndryshe nga sa \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkuar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykimin e t\u00eb pandehurit. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb zbatimin e nenit 375 t\u00eb K.Penal, fakti nuk ndryshon por cil\u00ebsimi juridik i tij (natyra e akuz\u00ebs) rivler\u00ebsohet nga gjykata n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimin jura novit curia (gjykata e njeh ligjin), pra fakti q\u00eb i atribuohet t\u00eb pandehurit nuk ndryshon dhe mbetet i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb. Fakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb \u201ci nj\u00ebjti fakt objektiv\u201d i cili karakterizohet nga te nj\u00ebjtat veprime, subjekte dhe objekt material. Pra, \u201cfakti i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb\u201d do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb fakti jo vet\u00ebm n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij t\u00eb jet\u00eb i nj\u00ebjt\u00eb, por edhe se asnj\u00eb element i tij p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs nuk duhet t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb i ndrysh\u00ebm nga ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb akuz\u00ebn e paraqitur nga prokurori. Kolegji konstaton se fakti penal q\u00eb i \u00ebsht\u00eb atribuuar t\u00eb gjykuarit E.A.n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces penal, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar n\u00eb aktin e njoftimit t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim \u2013 vjedhje me dhun\u00eb t\u00eb sendit aparat celular duke p\u00ebrdorur nj\u00eb send n\u00eb dukje si arm\u00eb(&#8230;) Akuza \u00ebsht\u00eb ndryshuar\/sakt\u00ebsuar nga prokurori vet\u00ebm gjat\u00eb konkluzioneve p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb parashtruara prej tij, duke pranuar q\u00eb akuza e vjedhjes me dhun\u00eb n\u00eb ngarkim t\u00eb gjykuarit nuk q\u00ebndron. Prokuroria n\u00eb konkluzionet p\u00ebrfundimtare ka pranuar q\u00ebndrimin e mbrojtjes(&#8230;) Kolegji vler\u00ebson jo t\u00eb drejt\u00eb e ligjor k\u00ebt\u00eb q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb prokurorit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, i cili n\u00eb thelb ka ndryshuar akuz\u00ebn n\u00eb diskutimin p\u00ebrfundimtar, ndon\u00ebse gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar n\u00eb gjendjen e akteve t\u00eb fashikullit hetimor, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb procedimit me gjykim t\u00eb shkurtuar. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb shqyrtimi gjyq\u00ebsor i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes nuk ka ndikuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u201csakt\u00ebsim t\u00eb akuz\u00ebs\u201d nga prokurori, p\u00ebrsa koh\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikuar asnj\u00eb prov\u00eb apo rrethan\u00eb apo fakt i ri\/i ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb raport me aktet\/provat e p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb fashikullin e hetimeve (pik\u00ebrisht pasi gjykimi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar mbi aktet e hetimit) 1760895186454","og_url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/","og_site_name":"Petani Law Firm","article_published_time":"2025-12-26T18:32:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-12T12:25:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":1600,"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Stafi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scritto da":"Stafi","Tempo di lettura stimato":"3 minuti"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/"},"author":{"name":"Stafi","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90"},"headline":"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal","datePublished":"2025-12-26T18:32:55+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-12T12:25:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/"},"wordCount":595,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg","articleSection":["Petani Blog"],"inLanguage":"it-IT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/","name":"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal - Petani Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-12-26T18:32:55+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-12T12:25:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"it-IT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-04-24-at-4.29.29-PM.jpeg","width":1200,"height":1600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/titulli-rikualifikimi-i-akuzes-kufizimi-ndaj-ndryshimit-te-faktit-penal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Titulli Rikualifikimi i akuz\u00ebs: kufizimi ndaj ndryshimit t\u00eb faktit penal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","name":"Petani Law Firm","description":"Law Firm in Durr\u00ebs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#organization","name":"Petani Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/logo.png","width":500,"height":155,"caption":"Petani Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/sq\/#\/schema\/person\/6dde4e6d9a37ed818d90e2333ea4df90","name":"Stafi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/cropped-Untitled-design-30-1-96x96.png","caption":"Stafi"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3322"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3322\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3416,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3322\/revisions\/3416"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.petani-lawfirm.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}